Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Sales topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves two excess-land sales including OIN 839; corrects acreage and price on adjacent parcel

2428278 · February 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Diversion Authority Land Management Committee approved the sale of excess parcel OIN 839 at a reduced offer and approved a corrected acreage/price for a second previously declared excess parcel.

The Diversion Authority Land Management Committee approved two excess-land sales during its Feb. 26 meeting, including a sale of OIN 839 and a corrected-price approval for a second parcel where staff found a acreage calculation error.

Eric Dodds, a consultant with AE2S, reviewed three excess-land recommendation items for the committee. For OIN 839 — a former residential parcel in the upstream mitigation area — Dodds said the parcel was declared excess about a year earlier and offered per the authority’s excess-land policy. After preference offers to member entities, the former owner and adjacent landowners produced no interest; the parcel went to public sale. A recent offer of $7,000 arrived; staff had recommended an original sale price of $10,500 but recommended approving the $7,000 offer. The committee approved that sale by roll-call vote.

For a second parcel (previously calculated at 7.877 acres), staff discovered an inadvertent double-counting of temporary construction acres. The corrected size is 4.917 acres. Using the same recommended per-acre price of $6,700, staff revised the recommended sale price from $53,000 to $33,000 and presented that correction to the committee. Committee members approved the corrected acreage and sale price by roll call.

Both votes were recorded as carried by majority/affirmative roll call and the chair ruled each motion carried. Committee members had no recorded objections during the roll-call votes on these two items.

The committee’s actions are recommendations to the Diversion Authority; final authority action was noted as outside this meeting’s scope.