Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers present revised concept for 218 West Market hotel; BAR pushes for richer materials and stronger pedestrian connections
Summary
Developers presented a reworked proposal for a multistory hotel at 218 West Market Street; the Board of Architectural Review supported moves to improve pedestrian activation but asked for richer, more durable materials and a more prominent ceremonial stair linking Old Preston Avenue to the Downtown Mall.
Get email alerts on the Downtown Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers of a proposed multi‑story hotel at 218 West Market Street presented a considerably reworked concept to the Charlottesville Board of Architectural Review on March 1. The BAR praised changes that improve pedestrian activation and circulation but asked for stronger materiality and refinements to massing and streetscape details before a formal Certificate of Appropriateness application.
Why it matters: The 218 West Market site sits at a complex transition between the Downtown Mall, the Omni hotel parcel and the Old Preston Avenue corridor. The project’s scale and visibility make its design and materials a focal point for the mall’s western terminus and for several adjacent viewpoints.
Project team principals — including Bob Peneo of Design Develop Architects and the project architect (Patel) — said the updated design focuses on three objectives: (1) restore a clear pedestrian connection from West Market/Old Preston into the mall via a ceremonial entry and stair; (2) push parking and service zones to the west/lower elevations to reduce the development’s impact on the mall; and (3) refine facades and rooftop composition so each elevation responds to its distinct context.
Peneo told the BAR the team used 3‑D point‑cloud scans of the context to test sightlines and pedestrian views. He said the building’s design will make the retail edge an extension of the mall, add terraces and a second‑floor restaurant/amenity that overlooks the mall, and use step‑backs and verticality so the mass does not overwhelm adjacent historic buildings.
Bar members offered a mix of encouragement and pointed feedback. Several board members welcomed the move to segregate and conceal vehicular circulation and to create terraces and a stepped retail edge that will activate the street. But many members — including longtime reviewers — said the upper stories feel visually generic in the current renderings and urged more durable, tactile materials (brick, stone, metal) rather than broad expanses of stucco or fibercement.
Board members also pushed the applicant to make the Old Preston ceremonial stair feel truly civic and public rather than back‑of‑house. One member suggested widening the stair so it reads as a direct, formal link from Old Preston to the hotel lobby and the mall.
Several BAR members said that while some upper‑level massing and glazing is acceptable where views are limited, the retail and ground‑floor elevation should read as a continuation of the historic storefront rhythm. They encouraged the team to study how cornice and storefront datum lines on the adjacent blocks could be echoed in the new building to preserve a consistent pedestrian scale.
Next steps: The BAR asked the team to return with refined materials and details, a more developed pedestrian‑stair section and enlarged street‑level elevations that better show storefront rhythm, canopies and landscape sections. The team indicated it will continue to refine materials and to test adjustments to the stair/pedestrian sequence and return for a subsequent review.

