Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meals On Wheels Rfp topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

LegacyLink change prompts Hart County to issue Meals-on-Wheels RFP for senior center

2425902 · February 26, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

LegacyLink's change to vendor contracting led Hart County staff to prepare an RFP for Meals on Wheels food service; the board authorized issuing the RFP with an April 3, 2025 deadline and discussed reimbursement rates and client counts.

Hart County staff told commissioners that LegacyLink (the district-level aging services organization) will no longer contract centrally with food vendors for congregate and home-delivered meals, and the board authorized issuing a county RFP for Meals on Wheels food service.

Kelli (senior center director) explained that LegacyLink has moved from a single, district-level contract to a model where each county or senior center must contract directly with a vendor. The county must pay vendor costs up front but will be reimbursed through federal and state funding. Kelli provided reimbursement figures included in the packet: for congregate meals the county’s projected reimbursement for 2025 is about $16.15 per meal (up from $7.40 in 2024 in the materials presented); for home-delivered meals reimbursements rose from $2.66 to $4.22 per meal in the materials reviewed.

Kelli said the center serves about 25–30 congregate diners daily (35–40 on peak days such as bingo Wednesdays) and about 100 home-delivery clients; staff noted they shift portions of budgets (20% rules described in the packet) to cover transportation and home-delivery reimbursements where allowed.

The board authorized issuing an RFP with standard submission requirements and a deadline of April 3, 2025 at 2 p.m. Eastern, and directed staff to include standard late-bid rejection language. Commissioners discussed potential vendor options including local providers, the jail kitchen as a potential vendor (noting differing cost profiles), and the possibility of asking clients to contribute a portion to offset vendor costs if necessary. Staff said the county would solicit competitive proposals and evaluate vendor pricing and capacity before awarding a contract.