Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Religious Released Time topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee debates allowing school credit for religious "released time"; amendment attached then bill tabled
Summary
A House Education Committee on HB 343 spent more than an hour debating whether and how public school districts could award academic credit for religious "released time" instruction, then voted to table the bill after close roll calls on amendments and the measure itself.
Get email alerts on the Religious Released Time topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A House Education Committee on HB 343 spent more than an hour debating whether and how public school districts could award academic credit for religious "released time" instruction, then voted to table the bill after close roll calls on amendments and the measure itself.
The bill, sponsored by Representative Greg, would authorize school district trustees to adopt a policy allowing academic credit for religious instruction presented during released time. The sponsor said the measure merely “authorize[s]” districts and drew on longstanding practice in some states and earlier Montana policy.
Supporters and opponents both told the committee the legislation would create choice for parents and students but raised sharply different questions about how districts would verify course content, supervise instructors and avoid constitutional entanglement between church and state. "I do find, however, that I still have some concerns ... we might run afoul of our constitutional provisions regarding church and state," Representative Thane said during debate and said she would vote no on the amendment under consideration.
Committee staff described the amendment stack. The amendment that passed (attached to the bill) turned mandatory language about awarding credit into permissive language — changing a "shall" to a "may" — and added language clarifying that released time cannot affect a pupil's enrollment status, attendance record or state funding calculations. Committee counsel explained the amendment would make awarding credit optional and require any credit awarded to follow specified criteria. "Starting actually I'll start on the back at the top of page 2 ... turning a shall into a may to make that, optional instead of mandatory," committee counsel said.
The committee conducted a roll-call on the amendment that attached to the bill; the clerk recorded the final tally as 8 in favor and 7 opposed. The chair then moved the bill as "once amended." A second amendment (described in the hearing as Amendment 0.004) that would have removed the accreditation-related language was then considered and failed on roll call, 6–9. The committee then voted on the bill as once amended; the clerk recorded the final vote as 7 for and 8 against. After the close vote, a motion to table the bill passed by voice vote and the measure was put on the table.
During discussion, the committee invited Montana School Boards Association counsel and a public-education policy witness, who recounted how the Board of Public Education and statute have previously allowed districts to apply alternate methods for awarding credit (for example, proficiency-based credit), and warned trustees already have statutory duties about recognizing equivalent proficiency. A witness from the superintendent's office said the existing state rules and trustee duties permit some flexibility but that awarding credit for religious instruction raises questions of supervision, instructor qualifications, and the potential for districts to expend staff resources evaluating community-provided religious programs.
Representative Alvaro said his alternate amendment aimed to preserve access while keeping the requirement (a "shall") that districts allow released time, but without requiring districts to accredit programs in a way that would consume staff time. Representative Strand and others opposed the credit portion as overly ambiguous, saying districts lack capacity to assess curricula and instructor qualifications consistently.
The chair ended executive action on HB 343 after the tabling motion. No further committee direction was recorded on implementation steps or referral.
Ending: The committee attached a permissive-credit amendment to HB 343 but later tabled the bill after a narrow final vote and a successful motion to table. The transcript shows continuing concerns about accreditation, supervision and church–state issues that would need to be resolved before the committee advances the bill again.
