Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fpr Digesters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee probes rules for food‑processing residuals and county digester pilot funding
Summary
Members pressed the Department of Agriculture on how the state will regulate and track food‑processing residuals (FPRs) applied to farmland and on a proposed $2 million county digester pilot included in the governor’s innovation expansion. The department said it will raise reporting and credentialing requirements for FPRs and that digesters need
Committee members asked how Pennsylvania will manage growing flows of food‑processing residuals (FPRs) coming into the state and how the proposed $2,000,000 county‑based digester pilot would be structured.
Representative Friel and others said FPRs can be beneficial but raised concerns about odor, variable nutrient content and lack of reporting for loads brought from other states. Secretary Redding said the department agrees standards for FPRs must be raised and that the administration is proposing to align FPR oversight more closely with manure standards, increase reporting and require credentials for applicators.
On digesters, members noted costs are high—Redding said projects can be in the millions of dollars—and asked how community or regional digesters would be financed and permitted. The department said the innovation proposal includes $2,000,000 specifically targeted to county or regional digester projects inside the Ag Innovation Fund and that those projects will likely require tailored criteria separate from the general innovation grant scoring. Redding noted some counties have active interest and that the State Conservation Commission will provide guidance on conservation‑linked energy projects.
Lawmakers asked for clarity on siting and permitting, how digesters will accept FPRs, and how to prevent industrial companies from using farm designations to site large industrial digesters on farms. The department said it expects to receive proposals and to support financing discussions and public‑private partnerships, and that digesters can reduce odor and manage nutrient loads when properly sited and operated.
Members requested draft criteria for the digester pilot and clearer reporting requirements for FPRs before funding is approved.
