Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Memorials topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Vero Beach committee backs submariners and Navy SEALs monuments, agrees to sign updates and site work

2411494 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Veterans Memorial Island Committee voted to recommend monuments honoring submariners and Navy SEALs to city council and discussed a donated ship's bell, new signage and placement, and follow-up work with public works and veterans groups.

At a meeting of the Veterans Memorial Island Committee in Vero Beach, members voted to recommend two new monuments — one honoring submariners and one honoring Navy SEALs/frogmen — to the City Council and agreed to work with public works and veterans groups on locations, bases and installation details. The committee also reviewed a donated ship's bell for the World War II area, discussed improvements to visitor signage, and received updates on upcoming Memorial Day recognitions.

The committee approved the concept of a submariners monument and the concept of a monument honoring Navy SEALs and related frogmen units, with details to be worked out before the proposals go to City Council for final approval and permitting. Committee Chair John Turner moved the submariners recommendation, saying, "I make a motion that we approve a monument for the submariners on Memorial Island." The motion was seconded and carried by voice vote. Turner later moved the SEALs proposal, saying, "I made a motion that we approve the idea of a frogman on Memorial Island with details to follow," and that motion also passed by voice vote.

Why it matters: Committee members said both monuments would add historical context to Memorial Island and provide local residents and visitors places to remember service members who trained or were lost in coastal operations. Speakers emphasized keeping installations compatible with the island's existing monuments, siting them near the Navy marker and water where appropriate, and minimizing new construction where possible.

Discussion and next steps: Submarine veterans' representatives said the local base will fund the submariners memorial. Paul Hyatt, identified in the meeting as base commander for the Submarine Veterans of the Treasure Coast, described the group's membership and local memorial history and confirmed that the local submarine veterans will pay for the proposed memorial. The committee debated exact placement (including whether to use the existing sundial pad), the need for a concrete base if the monument requires additional engravings or room to walk around, and how the proposal intersects with the committee's rules for memorials. Committee members noted an existing policy limiting individual memorialization on the island to service members who joined from Indian River County; that rule will affect inscriptions and names.

The National Navy SEAL Museum's CEO, Rick Kaiser, presented options and asked for guidance on design constraints. "My name is Rick Kaiser. I'm the CEO of the National Navy Seal Museum," he said, and described prior museum memorials and the museum's interest in a life-size, action-oriented statue that would evoke seals coming from the water. Committee members and staff advised Kaiser to coordinate with public works on siting and permitting, particularly if elements would be placed near or in the water (which could raise mangrove, permitting and Coast Guard issues).

Other island business: Chair John Turner displayed a donated ship's bell from the Sexton family intended for placement near the World War II tribute; the bell is a heavy bronze ship's bell with historical markings and will be mounted so the clapper can be secured for ceremonies. Jerry Stanley, representing the Submarine Veterans, asked whether the bell would be mounted; committee members discussed mounting height and protection from tampering. Committee members also reviewed updated signage proposals for the island — Christina Ballard (public works) presented a draft that consolidates several small, wordy signs into one larger, concise sign to improve readability and visitor behavior; public works offered to prototype the sign once the language is finalized.

Votes at a glance: - Approval of minutes as presented — motion carried by voice vote at the start of the meeting (procedural). - Recommendation to City Council: concept approval for a Submariners monument on Memorial Island — motion by John Turner; second not specified on the record; outcome: approved (committee will work out placement, base requirements, and send formal recommendation to City Council). Note: local submarine veterans stated they will fund the memorial; construction timing estimated at about 30 days once fabricated, per presenters. - Recommendation to City Council: concept approval for a Navy SEALs/frogman monument on Memorial Island — motion by John Turner; second not specified on the record; outcome: approved (staff and presenters to work with public works on siting, permitting, and design refinements; possible target dedication dates discussed include April [submarine birthday] or Memorial Day).

What was not decided: The committee approved concepts and voted to forward recommendations to City Council; it did not finalize exact monument designs, final placement, engineered bases, or final inscription language. Members specifically deferred final decisions about whether to place names of specific submarines (for example USS Dorado, Thresher, Scorpion) or individuals until design and ordinance constraints are clarified.

Follow-up and timeline: Committee members and presenters agreed to walk the island and present refined site proposals and mockups at the next meeting. Public works staff offered to prototype the new consolidated sign once the committee finalizes wording and graphics. Presenters estimated manufacturing time for the submariners monument at roughly 30 days after final sign-off; however, committee members emphasized that engraving, base work and City Council action could extend that schedule. The committee also noted ongoing maintenance needs for existing monuments and agreed to follow up on a Vietnam veterans marker trim that requires repair.

Speakers quoted in this report spoke during the committee meeting and are listed in the article's speaker section for attribution.