Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Public commenter alleges district using referendum dollars for office move, cites $2.3 million relocation request

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A public commenter said the administration is seeking $2.3 million to relocate the district office to the high school, asserted that leftover referendum funds intended for ninth grade campus work were instead used for a pool, and urged transparency on the funding source for what he described as a pending district-office move.

William McIntosh, a member of the public, addressed the board during the public input period to question a capital-improvement plan item staff planned to present that he said would require $2.3 million in taxpayer dollars to relocate the district office to the high school.

McIntosh asserted that prior situation reports and discussions dating from February–April 2024 had included a recommendation to move the district office into the Empower (Power) Academy space on the ninth-grade campus, and that on April 8, 2024, that recommendation no longer appeared in a situation report presented to the board. He told the board he believed nearly $2,000,000 left over from the ninth-grade campus referendum had been used for construction of the pool and that the district had not explained why the earlier district-office recommendation was removed.

McIntosh said the current capital-improvement report proposes an additional $2.3 million in taxpayer dollars for a district-office move that, in his view, “should have already taken place,” and he asked for clarity on the funding source and the board’s decision-making. The district did not respond during the public comment period with a detailed accounting; the matter was later discussed in the staff CIP presentation and is scheduled for further board review.