Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debate over placing policy changes on agenda fails after mixed roll-call votes
Summary
A motion to add proposed changes to policies 2330 and 2450 (and possibly 7300) to the board’s policy agenda failed after a divided roll-call vote; members and the chair debated appropriate procedure under board policy.
Get email alerts on the Board Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A motion to include two proposed policy changes — on policy 2330 and on policy 2450 (and possibly policy 7300) — on the board’s policy agenda was brought forward and defeated after a roll-call vote.
Dr. Tim Merrick moved that changes to policy 2330 and 2450 be included in the policy section of the regular board meeting agenda. The motion drew discussion about whether policy changes must go to the policy committee or could be brought directly to the full board under existing rules. Merrick cited policy 2330’s subsection b as allowing direct board consideration and said he had forwarded suggested changes to the superintendent and the policy committee earlier.
During the vote, the clerk called roll: Melissa Mason, Josie Barnhart and Pat Bradford voted no; Judy Justice and Dr. Tim Merrick voted yes; David Perry and an identified “Mister Littlemore” voted no. A board member raised a point of order arguing that the board could not vote to circumvent existing policy unless it first invoked policy 2450 to ignore standard procedure. The chair ruled the motion not well taken and the motion failed.
Board discussion included concerns about proper procedure and governance. One board member described invoking policy 2450 to avoid the usual process as “terrible governance” but acknowledged it was an available option under current rules.

