Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glendora Council adopts midyear budget changes, affirms reserves amid lower sales tax receipts
Summary
City finance staff presented a midyear review showing a balanced general fund, reduced sales-tax projections, and continued reliance on Measures E and Z. Council adopted a resolution amending the FY 2024–25 budget 4–0 and discussed long-term capital needs for facilities and water systems.
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance Budgeting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Glendora City Council adopted a resolution amending the fiscal year 2024–25 budget after a midyear review that showed lower-than-expected sales-tax receipts but continued compliance with the city’s reserve policy.
Kyle Johnson, finance director and city treasurer, told the council that combined sales-tax revenues and Measure E/Z receipts were down roughly $1.35 million compared with the same quarter in 2023, driven by lower third-quarter sales in autos, fuel, and building and construction sectors. Despite that decline, Johnson said the general fund remains balanced and meets reserve requirements, aided by Measure E and Z transfers and prior fiscal actions.
Johnson presented a multi-year forecast that assumes modest increases in property tax and a small recovery in sales taxes, a 15% projected increase in planning and building user fees tied to an upcoming fee study, and continued transfers from Measures E and Z that will subsidize general fund operations in the near term. He also noted the water fund will add a full-time water conservation officer to comply with water-conservation regulations and that internal service funds will cover planned capital purchases such as IT backup systems and vehicle replacements.
Councilmembers asked for clarity on the city’s reserve targets: Johnson explained the operational reserve policy aims to maintain 30%–45% of prior-year general fund operating expenditures (roughly three to six months of operating reserves at those levels). Councilmembers and staff acknowledged longer-term capital and facility needs—staff estimated more than $50 million in immediate maintenance on existing facilities and tens to hundreds of millions for major new facilities or significant structural alterations—emphasizing the council will need to discuss long-term funding options in upcoming budget planning.
Councilmember Karen moved adoption of the resolution to amend the FY 2024–25 budget and Mendel seconded; the motion passed 4–0.
The council directed staff to continue the city’s two-year budget and strategic-planning process and to return with options for addressing capital-facility needs in the coming months.

