Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Senate subcommittee debates timeline changes to bad-faith insurance claims; members seek compromise
Summary
A Senate Judiciary subcommittee debated proposed changes to bad-faith insurance law that would create statutory time windows for insurers to respond to pre-suit demands and post‑suit bad‑faith claims. Witnesses and members disagreed on fixed deadlines; lawmakers directed stakeholders to negotiate narrower timeframes before the bill advances.
A Senate Judiciary subcommittee heard competing testimony on proposed changes to South Carolina bad‑faith insurance law that would set statutory deadlines for insurers to respond to pre‑suit demands and to post‑suit bad‑faith claims.
The changes under discussion would create a mandatory delay period before an insured or claimant may file a bad‑faith suit — provisions that witnesses warned could force small businesses and owner‑operators into bankruptcy if insurers withheld payment for months. Lee Cope, a witness who identified himself to the subcommittee, said, "This 3 to 13 month time period ... makes 0 sense to me" and argued the change would give insurers a built‑in financial incentive to delay payments. "If I can hold on to that claim by this bill for 13 months, I'm gonna pay less," Cope told the panel.
Rob Moseley, another witness who described practical…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
