Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Charter And Capital topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Williamsport finance committee discusses home-rule option, city hall facilities and financing as related items
Summary
Committee members used the meeting's related-items segment to revisit discussion of a home-rule charter and the city's significant facility needs. Members asked administration about options to finance city hall and integration of departments; no formal decisions were made, and council requested an informational session with DCED.
Williamsport's finance committee discussed two related items on Feb. 25: whether to pursue a home-rule charter to gain taxing flexibility, and how to address urgent city facility needs, including a possible new or renovated city hall.
Why it matters: home rule could change local taxing powers and revenue options; choices about facilities could require debt financing and would affect city operations and budgets for years.
Councilwoman Liz Meeley raised the option after recent conversations with the Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development. “It was we we talked to them. I wouldn't say that they were heavily recommending, but they were ... that was an option that they recommended based on the taxing flexibilities that it allows,” she said, describing DCED's advice that home rule can provide options such as changes to earned-income or local service taxes.
Committee members described a recent draft study on facility alternatives — renovating the current city hall, acquiring and modifying another building, or building a new facility — and said many options in the draft appear financially challenging. Members said the city's current dispersion of departments across multiple leased locations is harming operations and morale and that bringing services together would be beneficial. Randy Allison urged that the finance analysis include the capital need and how debt capacity would affect the city's long-term finances.
Committee members asked administration to set up an informational session for the full council with DCED about home rule and municipal tax reform. Committee members also discussed how council should be engaged during the consultant STAMP process — suggesting either a steering committee member from council or regular updates to the finance committee — so elected officials are not presented with a finished plan without prior input.
No formal action was taken at the Feb. 25 meeting. Members agreed to bring the topic of a DCED-led home-rule informational session to the full council and to consider including home-rule implications in the STAMP update scope.
Next steps: administration and council leadership will coordinate with DCED to schedule an informational session about home rule and municipal tax options; the STAMP consultant will be asked to include analysis of capital and revenue options as part of the upcoming engagement.
