Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Taxes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New Wasatch resident protests secondary-home tax classification; council directs staff and assessor to investigate
Summary
A recent homebuyer who moved from California said county records listed her primary residence as secondary, triggering higher taxes. She asked the council for relief; staff and the assessor's office said they will put the matter on a future agenda and review notification processes.
Kathy Graff, a recent Wasatch County homebuyer who said she closed on a house in September, told the council she was surprised to find her newly purchased primary residence was officially classified as a secondary home and that she received no clear notice of the classification process. "I just feel, to be honest, that I was cheated and scammed and lied to," Graff said during public comment.
Graff described repeated attempts to get guidance from the title company, realtor and mortgage company and said she received forms and notices she did not understand. She said the classification produced an unexpected increase in escrow and an out-of-pocket tax cost she estimated at about $3,800 that she did not plan for.
A council member and county staff explained that, under the county’s current practice, properties can be defaulted to secondary status and that the county has in the past allowed a period for owners to provide evidence to designate a property as primary. Staff said that in Wasatch County, Summit County and Washington County the local practice has been to default newcomers to secondary, though a council member said counties have different local practices and that state law governs classifications in some respects.
Dustin (county staff) told Graff staff can work with the assessor’s office to schedule an agenda item for a future council meeting and to gather documentation related to her specific request. Staff also said the assessor’s office has a primary/secondary specialist, Linea Stanley, and encouraged Graff to provide contact information so staff could follow up. "Put it on the agenda and we'll see what we can do for you," a council member told Graff.
Council members discussed longer-term changes to the county’s process for notifying new homeowners, including extending a notification grace period and adding clearer language to preliminary tax notices. One council member said a revised system with additional notification and extended timelines was expected by the end of the year.
Why it matters: Homeowners’ primary-residence classification affects tax treatment and exemptions; errors or poor notice can cause unexpected, material expense for recent buyers.
What’s next: Staff will work with the assessor’s office to prepare an agenda item and gather documentation for Graff’s case. The council directed staff to explore additional communications and a possible extension of the notice period to accommodate new move-ins.
