Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elections topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Senate advances bill to prohibit electioneering at polling places during expanded early voting period

2394402 · February 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 105, sponsored on the floor by Senator Wendy Boyd, passed second reading on a 28-22 vote after extended discussion about how the measure would affect community forums, candidate events and early absentee voting locations.

Senate Bill 105 passed second reading on a 28-22 roll call after more than an hour of floor discussion about scope and unintended consequences. The bill would prohibit electioneering at polling locations "from the time ballots are available until all voting is completed," extending current statutory restrictions beyond Election Day to cover absentee and satellite voting periods.

Sponsor Senator Wendy Boyd framed the bill as a modernization of a law last substantially written in 1947 and said the change responds to court guidance and recent disputes over campaign activity at satellite polling locations. Boyd described a factual situation that prompted the change: campaign materials being handed out near an early voting satellite location and uncertainty whether the existing statute applied before Election Day.

Other senators raised concerns about the bill's language and practical effects. Senators asked whether the measure would prohibit candidate forums, home-improvement shows or other community events where candidates might hand out literature weeks before Election Day. Senator Vinton said such a broad prohibition would be "overly burdensome to campaigns" and voted against the measure. Senator Manzella said unclear language led her to vote no in committee. Senator Weber and others urged the sponsor to consider limiting the prohibition to hours when absentee ballots are actually being accepted at a particular polling place.

In closing, the sponsor said she would work on clarifying language in subsequent consideration and noted the bill aims to avoid litigation by updating statutes. The clerk recorded 28 ayes and 22 nays and the committee recommended the bill do pass on second reading.