Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cell Phone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Longmeadow committee reviews mixed feedback on student cell-phone use; plans stakeholder engagement
Summary
After a district survey returned mixed views, the school committee directed administration to convene stakeholder groups including parents, students and staff to draft clearer handbook language and age-based rules on phone use for 2025–26.
On Feb. 25, 2025, Longmeadow School Committee members reviewed survey results and open comments from parents, staff and faculty about the district's use-of-personal-devices policies and discussed next steps, including student focus groups and handbook-language recommendations for the 2025–26 school year.
Superintendent (unnamed) summarized the feedback as "mixed," noting there was no clear consensus across respondents. Administrators said the district received numerous open-ended responses that ranged from calls for a complete ban to requests for teaching responsible use; many respondents urged consistent enforcement across classrooms.
Administrators and staff described several recurring themes: support for age- or grade-based rules (with stricter limits at the elementary level), concerns that policing device use consumes instructional time, parent concerns about emergency access and the need to clarify how families should contact students during the school day.
Student Representative Andrew recommended strong direct communication with students: "If an email goes out to parents that phones have been banned at the elementary level ... that is gonna get misconstrued, and it's gonna within, like, 10 minutes, it's gonna be at the high school of kids thinking that there's an overall ban across the district." Andrew urged that every family communication also be shared directly with students.
Several classroom teachers who spoke to the committee emphasized safety and operational concerns in drills or emergency response. One teacher (unnamed) said, "In an emergency, I need eyes on me so that we know what we're doing. Not eyes down looking at folks." Teachers also emphasized modeling appropriate device behavior.
Administrators proposed a "tiered" approach that would treat K–5, 6–8 and 9–12 differently and recommended forming parent, student and staff working groups to draft handbook language. The superintendent said the district expects to begin stakeholder meetings in March and to bring suggested handbook language to the committee in spring to allow time for school-council and policy-subcommittee review before the 2025–26 school year.
The committee also noted recent guidance from the Massachusetts attorney general's office and pending state legislation that could affect local policies; administrators said the guidance does not prescribe a single approach.
No formal policy vote was taken; the item was informational and staff will return with draft language following stakeholder engagement.
