Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chilton County Commission votes 5-1 to temporarily suspend subdivision regulations
Summary
The Chilton County Commission on a 5-1 vote approved a motion to amend the effective date of the county's subdivision regulations, effectively suspending enforcement while new rules are drafted; Commissioner Headley voted no.
The Chilton County Commission voted 5-1 to temporarily amend the effective date for the county's subdivision regulations, a move commissioners said will pause enforcement while the commission adopts new rules.
Commissioner Perkins moved the resolution to amend the effective date of the subdivision regulations to Wednesday, 06/28/2025; Commissioner Childress seconded. The motion, as read into the public record, said that "during the period of time from the approval of this motion through the end of Tuesday, June 2025 or sooner if new subdivision regulations are adopted, no subdivision regulations would be in effect for Chilton County, Alabama," and included language clarifying that the action would not affect prior approvals, prosecutions, enforcement or civil actions arising before the motion's adoption.
Commissioners and staff said the county attorney reviewed the wording before the motion was filed. Supporters, including Perkins and Childress, described the action as a temporary measure to allow the county to adopt a revised regulatory framework; one commissioner noted he had worked on the draft at length. Commissioners also noted a typographical correction in the motion's third paragraph before the vote.
Commissioner Headley cast the lone dissenting vote. No additional amendments to the motion were recorded. The commission's motion stated that the suspension would not retroactively invalidate prior approvals or pending enforcement actions.
The commission did not provide a complete, unambiguous end date in the meeting record: the motion text as read references "the end of Tuesday, June 2025," a phrasing that was not clarified on the record. The motion also specified that the suspension would end sooner if new subdivision regulations are adopted.
The resolution was placed on the floor after a work-session discussion on proposed subdivision changes; commissioners said the county attorney had advised on legal ramifications and on preserving existing enforcement actions and approvals.
The commission recorded five votes in favor and one against; one commissioner (Billingsley) was noted as absent and recuperating.
