Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Stewart urges broader review of proposed Senate rule change, moves referral to Joint Rules Committee
Summary
Senator Stewart (State Senator) urged the Maine Senate on Tuesday to send a proposed rule change to the Joint Rules Committee for broader review, saying the measure addressed one procedural problem but risked unintended consequences if enacted piecemeal.
Get email alerts on the Legislative Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator Stewart (State Senator) urged the Maine Senate on Tuesday to send a proposed rule change to the Joint Rules Committee for broader review, saying the measure addressed one procedural problem but risked unintended consequences if enacted piecemeal.
Stewart said the proposal — described on the floor as intended to address what happened during consideration of the supplemental budget when some members were absent — would help in limited circumstances, such as registering votes when the minority party was not present. But he warned the change did not solve other scenarios, including a hypothetical in which a majority might act in a committee while the minority caucused elsewhere and later prevent absent members from recording votes. “Anytime that we do a knee-jerk reaction, we are opening ourselves up to even further unintended consequences,” Stewart said, and argued the discussion deserved the joint rules committee’s thorough vetting.
The senator said the original intent of the rule-change process was to prevent “strike-and-replace” amendments that are added without adequate review, but that the single fix on the floor left open other issues that warrant a comprehensive approach. He moved that “this item and all its accompanying papers be referred to the committee on joint rules.”
Separately, the senator from Cumberland, Senator Perce, moved that the item be tabled until later in the day. The transcript records both motions but does not record the outcome of the votes on those motions within the provided excerpt.
The floor exchange made a distinction between discussion and formal action: Stewart’s comments were presented as debate and a referral motion; Perce’s tabling motion was a separate procedural proposal. The transcript does not show a formal recorded vote or final disposition for the item during the provided meeting segment.
The matter remains pending in the Senate’s procedural process pending committee disposition or a later recorded floor vote.
