Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Foreign Influence Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate bill narrowed to require disclosure of foreign‑funded political activity and registration for agents of hostile nations
Summary
Senate Bill 177, returned to the committee with changes from last year’s version, would expand transparency requirements for lobbyists and groups acting on behalf of hostile foreign governments and would require disclosures when foreign funding supports political activity in Georgia.
The committee heard and advanced a revised version of Senate Bill 177, a proposal focused on transparency for foreign‑funded political activity and on registration for agents representing hostile foreign governments.
Sponsor remarks said the bill is intended to target lobbying and political activity by or on behalf of hostile foreign nations and to require registration and heightened penalties where appropriate. The sponsor and witnesses emphasized that the measure is narrowly tailored to increase disclosure rather than to bar political speech. Tom Rawlings, identified during testimony as a policy director for State Shield and a national organizer on foreign‑influence issues, described public reporting and investigative material in national outlets that raised concerns about foreign support for some U.S. political activity and said the bill was narrowed this session to focus on transparency.
Witnesses cited reporting such as pieces in the New York Times and Washington Post as background for concerns; the committee’s discussion referenced prior federal inquiries and past legislative efforts. The sponsor said a version of the bill passed both chambers last year but was vetoed by the governor; this year’s text has been trimmed to emphasize disclosure and registration rather than duplicating federal contribution bans.
The committee took a motion to proceed, and the measure was moved forward for further consideration. Committee members signaled interest in refining the definition of affected actors and ensuring the bill’s provisions do not infringe protected speech, while keeping the central focus on transparency of foreign funding and agents of hostile foreign governments.
