Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DuPage County Board debates extending public-comment time after contentious courthouse-naming dispute; matter sent to finance committee
Summary
At its Feb. 25 DuPage County Board meeting, members debated whether to extend the public-comment period from 30 to 60 minutes following a contentious session about the removal of Henry Hyde's name from the courthouse. The board agreed to refer a rules-change discussion to the Finance Committee for consideration.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DuPage County Board members spent a large portion of their Feb. 25 meeting debating whether to extend the board's public-comment period from 30 minutes to 60 minutes after last week's heated meeting about the removal of Henry Hyde's name from the county courthouse. Rather than change the rule on the floor, members agreed to place the issue on the Finance Committee agenda for a rules review.
The discussion followed a meeting earlier this month that board members described as unusually long and contentious. Member Ozog, a DuPage County Board member, said he had voted against extending public participation at that earlier meeting but now wanted a formal discussion of alternatives. "I'd like to discuss the idea of increasing the time to 60 minutes," Ozog said, adding that the board had previously set a three-minute-per-speaker limit and a 30-minute total for public comment.
Why it matters: public-comment rules shape when and how residents are heard at official meetings and affect staff workload and meeting length. Several board members said the county should preserve orderly meetings while accommodating residents who travel to speak in person.
Supporters of a longer public-comment window said the change would let more residents speak on rare, high-interest items. Member Rutledge said extending to 60 minutes could cover unusual occasions without producing the multi-hour public-comment sessions the board has experienced in the past. "Extending it to 60 minutes would cover when we do have a situation like last week, which is not that often," Rutledge said.
Opponents warned of unintended consequences. Member Kajewski noted that allowing one speaker to exceed the three-minute rule can prevent other residents from speaking and said strict enforcement of the existing limits can allow more individuals to be heard. "By doing that, you also cut off two more people," Kajewski said, referring to a prior meeting where one speaker went well beyond three minutes.
Several members raised concerns about written public comments submitted electronically. The county's current practice is to include portal-submitted comments in the official minutes and to provide them to board members in advance. Member Colbert and others said electronic submissions enable people from outside DuPage County to influence local meetings and sometimes contain offensive material; Member Garcia said she opposed requiring staff to read offensive online submissions aloud at meetings.
The debate was interwoven with continued fallout from the earlier vote involving the courthouse name. Member Zay defended the late congressman Henry Hyde, saying, "Henry Hyde was a man of principle," while other members said the prior action reflected resident sentiment and was part of a long-running conversation about naming public buildings.
Board procedure and decorum were also discussed. One member cited Robert's Rules of Order while urging that the chair not engage directly in debate from the dais; another said the chair used appropriate discretion in managing the meeting.
Outcome and next steps: Rather than immediately change the rule, the board agreed to refer the matter to the Finance Committee for a formal discussion of whether to revise the public-comment rule (the motion to place the item on the Finance Committee agenda was supported during the meeting). No formal rule change was adopted at the Feb. 25 meeting.
Votes at a glance (items approved by roll call during the Feb. 25 meeting): - FIR0040: Annual financial commitment to the DuPage Convention & Visitors Bureau, $50,000 — approved by roll call. - FIR0041: Acceptance and appropriation for DuPage Care Center Foundation projects fund (Secret Garden design/architectural services), $16,766 — approved by roll call. - FIR0044: Acceptance and appropriation for 2-1-1 Illinois program grant, $44,972 — approved by roll call. - FIR0046: Income eligible retrofit program (weatherization), $417,960 — approved by roll call. - FIP0002: Contract/purchase order to Corbel Corporation for human resources third-party administrator services, contract not to exceed $259,497 (03/01/2025' 02/29/2028) — approved by roll call. - DCP1-25: Contract to National Auto Fleet Group for three 2025 Ford Bronco Sport vehicles for Building & Zoning, total not to exceed $96,631.62 — approved by roll call. - Multiple facilities-management (FMP) and transportation (DTP) vehicle and equipment contracts listed on the agenda (examples: new day cab for sludge hauling, Ford Transit cargo van, Ford F-50 trucks, water treatment chemicals, HVAC supplies) — approved by roll call. - Appointments: Several board appointments to local authorities and districts (weed control superintendent; airport authority seats; Wheaton Sanitary District; West Chicago Mosquito Abatement District; emergency telephone board system/911 members) — approved by roll call.
The meeting record shows multiple other routine contract awards, grant appropriations and monthly reports approved on the consent agenda. The Feb. 25 discussion on public-comment rules was the only item the board set aside for further committee consideration rather than immediate action.
Ending: The Finance Committee will schedule the public-comment rules discussion as a committee agenda item; board members who want a change were urged to consult colleagues and bring supporting language to that meeting. No formal rule change was enacted at the Feb. 25 session.

