Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners propose three-month suspension to rewrite subdivision rules, seek clearer developer/individual distinction
Summary
After public input and a contentious public meeting, commissioners said they will seek suspension of enforcement of the 2015 subdivision regulations for three months to rewrite rules that distinguish individual landowners from commercial developers; commissioners planned to vote at the next regular meeting.
Commissioners discussed proposed changes to Chilton County’s subdivision regulations and one commissioner said he will ask the board to suspend enforcement of the 2015 rules for three months to allow revisions that clearly separate individual landowners from commercial developers.
Commissioners said the 2015 regulations treat individual residents seeking to split a parcel the same as large developers building multiple lots and roads. “We want the rules to be on the developer and not those on the individual,” one commissioner said, describing the intent to use exclusions, definitions and thresholds to differentiate routine parcel splits from developer-led subdivision projects.
The proposed suspension would be a temporary halt to enforcement, not a repeal. Commissioners said they gathered public input at a recent public meeting and received “constructive ideas” and also encountered misinformation circulating in the community. They intend to incorporate public comments and follow-up research into rewritten regulations and asked staff to prepare language for the commission to consider.
One commissioner proposed the three-month suspension and another commissioner said, “I’ll second that.” Commissioners said they would vote on the suspension at their next regular meeting; no formal suspension vote was taken at the work session.
Commissioners and members of the public who spoke at the meeting urged protection of individual property rights while retaining standards for commercial subdivision development, stormwater mitigation and minimum safety requirements set by state law. Commissioners emphasized they are not discussing zoning authority or expanding state statutory requirements and said state regulations — for example, water/septic standards — would continue to apply.
If approved, staff said they will use the three-month pause to draft clearer definitions of “developer,” refine enforcement triggers and propose procedures for notice and review. The commission did not adopt any new rules at the work session and set a timeline to return a draft for consideration.
