Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vehicle Registration Cancellation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bill would allow Montanans to cancel or suspend vehicle registration to remove liability; county workload debated
Summary
House Bill 235 would create a voluntary registration cancellation and suspension process and a third‑party impleader provision to hold users liable; supporters cited cases of sellers left with liability, while county treasurers expressed administrative concerns.
HELENA — Lawmakers heard House Bill 235 on Wednesday, a proposal to allow owners to voluntarily cancel or suspend vehicle registration to remove liability and to permit impleader so a user who operates a vehicle with canceled or suspended registration can be held responsible for fines and civil claims.
Representative Neil Durham, sponsor of HB235, said the bill grew from constituent cases in which owners who expected a scrap or towing of an old vehicle continued to receive tickets or liability after the vehicle left their possession. Durham said the bill would add a statutory voluntary registration-cancellation process, require all owners’ consent for cancellation or suspension when multiple owners exist, and create an impleader mechanism so a user in possession of a canceled or suspended vehicle is the primary target for enforcement and civil recovery.
Michael Walker, bureau chief for the Motor Vehicle Division, appeared as an informational witness. He did not oppose the concept but took questions about how counties and treasurer offices would process cancellations. Committee members noted written concerns from Missoula County that the proposal could create administrative burdens and long lines at treasurer offices. Durham responded the sponsor’s intent was not to make sellers file the form every time they sell a vehicle and said he expected the process to be used infrequently; he said the Motor Vehicle Division’s planned online improvements should reduce county workload over time.
Senators pressed the sponsor on several practical questions, including whether registrations canceled mid‑year would yield prorated refunds; the sponsor said the bill did not currently provide for automatic rebates and that was not his intent. Lawmakers also raised the situation of vehicles owned by deceased people; the sponsor said an amendment to clarify estate handling would be appropriate.
The bill drew no organized proponents at the hearing and no formal vote was taken. Supporters framed the change as a limited tool to free owners of liability when a vehicle is transferred or misused, while critics cautioned the county-level administrative impacts should be resolved before committee action.
