Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Rules Codification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances HB 200 as part of multi‑year migration of department rules into statute
Summary
House Bill 200, sponsored by Representative Jordan Redmond, moves a second batch of Department of Health and Welfare rules into statute; sponsor and committee said the change is intended to lock in existing rules without changing practice.
House Bill 200 was advanced to the House floor with a due‑pass recommendation after Representative Jordan Redmond, R‑District 3 (who declared Rule 80 owing to retail‑pharmacy ownership), described the bill as part of a two‑year effort to migrate department rules into statute. "These rules were approved by us earlier this session. Moving them into statute locks them in and ensures that the legislature and elected lawmakers are in charge of making policy decisions going forward," Redmond said.
Redmond said the bill makes no substantive policy changes, does not expand practice authority, does not shrink it, and "imposes no new burdens and will not change practice." He answered a question about a provision on page 27 that prohibits annotated or postdated prescriptions by saying it reflects existing rule 400 from the board, which declares a prescription drug order invalid if annotated or postdated.
Committee members had no public testimony to consider and approved the motion to send the bill to the floor by voice vote. Representative Healy placed the formal motion to advance HB 200; the motion carried with the chair voting aye.
