Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee introduces bill to help districts cover extreme special-education costs

2381780 · February 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representatives introduced RS 32437 to create a state backstop for very high special-education spending on individual students, with proposed caps and coordination with Medicaid; the measure was introduced for a full hearing.

Representative Ben Furman of District 30 asked the House Education Committee to introduce RS 32437, a proposal to help school districts cover very large special-education costs for a small number of high-need students.

The bill targets the most expensive cases, Furman said, noting a statewide funding gap of about $80,000,000 for special education. Under the proposal, districts would absorb the first $15,000 of an individual student’s additional expenses; a state fund would contribute thereafter, and costs above $65,000 for an individual student would be split between the district and the state. Furman said each district would face a cap “roughly $150,000,” and that the bill’s initial statewide appropriation would be $3,000,000 as a starting point for a programmatic pilot.

W. Cutchfield, the state superintendent, told the committee the $3,000,000 figure is an estimate based on statewide data about the number of students who require full-time, one-on-one care. “It is an estimate,” Cutchfield said, adding the appropriation would be a place to start and that the line item would not be automatically distributed; districts would apply for funds after a student is enrolled. China Hirasaki, director of special education for the Idaho Department of Education, said typical special-education services (speech, counseling) are relatively inexpensive but that some students require medical care or full-time aides — for example, tracheostomy care or feeding-tube management — and those cases “can run upwards into the hundred-thousand dollar arena.”

Committee members pressed how RS 32437 would coordinate with other funding sources. Hirasaki explained the bill requires districts to seek other funding first, including Medicaid, which reimburses a portion of eligible school-based medical services but typically leaves a required local match near 30 percent. “If the school district encumbers an expense that is Medicaid reimbursable, it’s like they’re paying $10 up front … and getting reimbursed $7,” she said, describing the practical shortfall districts face. She noted some services — for example, American Sign Language interpreters — are not Medicaid-reimbursable and can cost $60,000–$70,000 for a single student depending on contract and geography.

Representative Tanner and others asked for more detail before a full hearing about how the $3,000,000 number was calculated and how applications would work; Cutchfield and Hirasaki said more data would be available at a hearing. Representative Sauter moved to introduce the RS for a full hearing and explained the measure responds to situations in which districts must assign full-time staff to single students, creating a significant budgetary burden.

The committee approved the motion to introduce RS 32437. Representative Harris was recorded as voting no; the motion otherwise carried and the RS will be scheduled for a full hearing where members requested further fiscal and operational information.

The measure as described would not change Medicaid policy; committee members repeatedly noted the proposal depends on existing Medicaid and local budgeting rules and that the appropriation is intended as a targeted state supplement, applied for after enrollment in district schools.