Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Higher Education Capital topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee forwards UNM Taos observatory funding request to finance without recommendation
Summary
Senate Bill 394, a request for capital funding to complete the UNM Taos Cielo Centro Observatory, was voted out of the Senate Education Committee with a 'no recommendation' and will go to the Finance Committee; proponents said the observatory will support STEM outreach and regional economic development.
Get email alerts on the Higher Education Capital topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Bill 394, which would provide $1.5 million toward the construction of the UNM Taos Cielo Centro Observatory, was carried out of the Senate Education Committee with a โno recommendationโ and referred to Finance.
Senator Gonzales introduced the request and called witnesses from UNM Taos, UNM Taos faculty and community liaisons to describe the projectโs education and workforce-development aims. Proponents said the observatory would be used primarily for Kโ12 outreach, to contextualize math and science curricula, and to inspire students to pursue STEM careers. โThereโs nothing better than astronomy to inspire and hook students of any age,โ said Colin Nichols, chair of the science department at UNM Taos, in testimony about field trips and student engagement.
Witnesses described the project as shovel-ready: the university reported completed construction documents and prior GO-bond allocations and other state funds committed to the project. The presentation noted UNM Taos had spent institutional funds on planning and design and that the project is planned in phases; the $1.5 million request would complete the primary observatory and amphitheater components, with ancillary pieces to follow as funding allows. The committee discussed broader capital funding practices and whether this kind of construction should be supported from general appropriations or through the capital/bond process; members also asked about local contributions and other grant opportunities, including potential NSF partnerships.
A motion for a 'no recommendation' (which allows a bill to advance without the committee's endorsement) passed by roll call and the bill was moved to the Finance Committee for further consideration. Committee members noted the projectโs expected educational reach and economic development potential but also raised concerns about capital funding priorities and the timing of state investments amid volatile revenue sources.
