Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Smoke Free Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

McCreary County health coalition presents data on secondhand smoke; court agrees to review

2380259 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A coalition of health groups presented county and state data on smoking, vaping and secondhand exposure and reported local survey support for a comprehensive smoke‑free policy; the fiscal court said it would review the information but took no formal action.

McCreary County — Representatives of a local health coalition and state tobacco‑control groups presented the McCreary County Fiscal Court with data on high local smoking and vaping rates and urged the court to consider drafting a comprehensive smoke‑free ordinance.

The Clearing the Air McCreary County coalition presented data during the fiscal court’s Feb. 13 meeting showing local adult smoking and related disease rates above state and national averages. Tiffany Baker, who identified herself as working with the McCreary County Health Department, said county adult COPD rates are about 3 percentage points higher than the state and that high blood pressure rates are nearly 5 percentage points higher. "Smoking is a risk factor for all the diseases we've talked about so far," Baker said.

The presentation noted respiratory and oral cancer rates above state and national averages and said McCreary County smoking rates are roughly double the national average and about 10 percentage points above the state average. The presenters said exposure to secondhand smoke and to secondhand aerosol from e‑cigarettes harms non‑smokers and children.

Julie Waters of the American Cancer Society described patient needs she has observed, including transportation and lodging during cancer treatment, and read excerpts from middle‑school student essays opposing e‑cigarette use. Amanda Bucher of the Kentucky Center for Smoke‑Free Policy at the University of Kentucky summarized statewide economic and health figures: she cited an annual estimated Kentucky health‑care cost from smoking of $2,230,000,000 and said Kentucky high school e‑cigarette use is about 21.9 percent compared with 10 percent nationally.

The coalition also shared results from a local outreach survey. The presenters said they collected 88 responses, mostly from residents, and reported that about one in four workers said they experienced secondhand exposure (the survey did not separate exposure to combustible tobacco from exposure to e‑cigarette aerosol). The presenters told the court that almost 90 percent of respondents supported a comprehensive smoke‑free policy in indoor workplaces and public places.

The coalition emphasized research showing community health and economic benefits in jurisdictions that adopt comprehensive smoke‑free laws, including lower hospitalizations for heart attacks and respiratory conditions and reduced youth initiation of tobacco products. Bucher said, "No level of exposure is safe," referring to secondhand smoke and secondhand aerosol.

Magistrates and County Judge Green asked procedural questions about enforcement and penalties; presenters said enforcement models vary locally and can include code enforcement, sheriff’s offices, fire departments or health departments and noted that such laws are often largely self‑enforcing if well publicized. Judge Green said the court would "take a look and discuss it" at a future meeting but did not propose or vote on an ordinance that night.

Why it matters: McCreary County officials heard local and state research linking smoking and vaping to disease and economic costs and were given local survey results showing apparent community support for a policy change. Any ordinance would change workplace and public‑place rules and raise questions about local enforcement and penalties.

The clearing the air coalition requested continued conversations with the fiscal court; no formal action or introduction of an ordinance was recorded on Feb. 13.