Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ammunition Sales topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances bill to restrict retail ammunition sales, sparking hours of debate and amendments
Summary
House Bill 11 33 would require retail ammunition to be accessible only with employee assistance, ban retail sales to people under 21 and place delivery and labeling requirements on shippers and carriers; the House debated and amended the measure for hours before advancing it for further consideration.
The Colorado House spent much of Feb. 21 in debate over House Bill 11 33, which would change how ammunition is sold at retail in the state. Sponsors said the measure would keep ammunition out of the hands of purchasers too young to lawfully buy firearms and would make certain deliveries and labels safer. Opponents said the bill would impose heavy compliance costs on small local retailers, limit lawful use and sporting activities, and raise constitutional concerns.
Key provisions in the bill as debated would require retailers to keep ammunition accessible to customers only with the assistance of an employee (for example, in an enclosed case or behind a counter) and prohibit sale of ammunition at retail to persons under 21. The bill also creates new requirements for vendors and delivery services: shippers must not label packages in ways that disclose the contents as ammunition, and deliverers must verify the recipient is 21 and obtain written acknowledgement on delivery.
Sponsors framed the measure as a public-safety step. Representative Duran, speaking during committee and floor debate, said bullets are a leading cause of youth deaths and that tighter retail controls, stricter delivery verification, and closing unattended ammunition vending points would reduce access in inappropriate circumstances.
Opponents — including rural representatives and small-business advocates — urged a no vote and pressed several points: many sporting, hunting and agricultural uses rely on commonly used rimfire ammunition and on ready access for young adults; small mom-and-pop retailers lack space and capital to reconfigure stores and could be forced to close or raise prices; delivery rules would increase costs for rural customers who rely on shipped ammunition; and laws with age-based purchase restrictions raise constitutional questions for some members.
Floor action produced a long series of amendments. Several bipartisan amendments were adopted (for example, to permit sales to U.S. military and Colorado National Guard members aged 18–20 and to align the age rule with other state firearm statutes for people born after a specified date). Other proposed changes failed, including broad carve-outs for specific districts, a set of grandfathering provisions for existing small retailers, and a district-exemption amendment that would have excluded specified House districts from the new rules.
After amendment votes and floor debate, the bill or its committee report was approved for placement on the calendar for third reading; earlier recorded votes on the bill and amendments showed a sharply divided House, with multiple roll-call tallies during the floor sequence. Lawmakers from rural districts repeatedly warned the bill would push business and sales across state lines and would impose disproportionate costs on small-town retailers and on hunters, farmers and shooting-sport participants.
Where the bill goes next: the House continued the calendar process and the bill is scheduled for third reading and final passage votes. The final form of the measure will determine whether it becomes state law, but the passage so far shows the legislature is divided on balancing retail regulation and second-amendment considerations.
