Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislators table $150,000 software funding request after debate over costs and procurement
Summary
Putnam County IT staff proposed buying online permitting and parks modules (vendor: OpenGov) to replace Munis workflows; the committee questioned costs, timing and procurement steps and voted to table the request pending more information and departmental briefings.
Putnam County’s Physical Services committee tabled a request to set aside up to $150,000 for a software purchase and implementation to modernize parks and consumer affairs operations.
IT Director Tom Laina told the committee the county has evaluated a government-focused vendor (OpenGov) to provide two modules that would replace cumbersome Munis workflows for consumer affairs permits (contractors, electricians, plumbers) and for parks operations (passes, day-use, community garden plots and facility bookings). He said the product would allow online payments and automated export/import to Munis for accounting.
Why it matters: committee members raised budget and procurement concerns because the vendor’s preliminary cost estimate included roughly $99,000 in first-year implementation costs and about $72,000 in recurring annual license fees. Committee members noted parks’ current annual fee revenue is roughly $22,000, and that the county currently pays Munis about $38,000 a year for a consumer affairs module. Several legislators said they were uncomfortable approving a not-to-exceed amount without a completed RFP, a full written cost breakout in the backup materials, and direct department testimony from parks and consumer affairs staff.
Matters discussed included whether convenience fees for credit-card payments would be absorbed (legislators said a prior decision had absorbed fees for parks), the ability of the proposed vendor to serve multiple departments on a single license, whether the health department or county clerk systems would double-enter data, and whether grants could offset cost. Staff said OpenGov (one-word) was used in neighboring jurisdictions and that the company’s regional salesperson was local.
Several legislators pressed for a formal procurement process and for additional written proposals. Concerns included the stated first-year and recurring costs versus current revenue and existing Munis costs, and the requested request-for-funds phrasing: the agenda asked for authority for staff to reserve funds of up to $150,000 before a final vendor selection.
The committee voted to table the item and requested that IT staff circulate vendor literature and cost breakdowns to legislators and that representatives from parks and consumer affairs appear before the committee to answer operational questions prior to a future vote.
Direct outcome: the motion to table passed. County staff and legislators agreed to discuss the item again, with requested written materials and departmental presentations, likely at an audit or future committee meeting.
