Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School committee weighs cellphone limits, stops short of districtwide ban
Summary
After students, staff and the superintendent described disruptions from phones, the Barnstable School Committee discussed bell-to-bell bans, 'off-and-away' rules, age-based exceptions and education strategies; no policy change was adopted at the Feb. 5 meeting.
The Barnstable School Committee devoted a substantial portion of its Feb. 5 meeting to cellphones and social media use in schools, hearing staff survey results, student views and model guidance from the state attorney general’s office but taking no policy vote.
Student perspective: Riley, a Barnstable High School student envoy, told the committee students rely on phones to coordinate with younger siblings and for internship communication, but acknowledged phones can be distracting. “I know that's going to be a topic you touch on later,” Riley said in a brief report; later conversation with administration elaborated on those points.
Administration and state guidance: Superintendent Sarah told the committee Attorney General Andrea Campbell has circulated a toolkit with guidance that ranges from “bell-to-bell” bans (no phone access during the school day) to “off-and-away” approaches that allow phone use outside instructional time. The superintendent said the AG has proposed possible state legislation on a bell-to-bell ban but has also released a toolkit advising local stakeholders to weigh disruptions, mental-health impacts and implementation costs.
High-school staff data: Principal Jason Kaneta reported results from a staff survey at Barnstable High School. He said about one-quarter of staff reported they rarely redirect students for phone use during class, while almost 50 percent said they redirect students 1–4 times per day; a quarter reported 5–10+ daily redirections. Staff were split on hallway/cafeteria access: about two-thirds said limited access during non-instructional time was not necessary, but one-third said students should have a break.
Committee discussion and options: Committee members and administrators discussed several implementation choices: a strict bell-to-bell ban; an off-and-away policy with clear routines and enforcement; age- or grade-tiered rules (for example, different expectations for younger students, eighth graders and seniors); and an emphasis on digital literacy education for students and families. Several committee members favored strengthening enforcement support for staff; others emphasized parent concerns about safety and real-time contact with students.
Why it matters: Committee members flagged mental-health research about teen social-media impacts, educators’ need for consistent enforcement support, and practical issues such as students using phones to check Aspen gradebook and coordinate transportation. Principal Kaneta said consistent enforcement and staff support are key: “If we don't support our staff, they're not gonna carry out what that message is.”
Ending: The committee did not change policy at the Feb. 5 meeting. Members said they expect follow-up work—education campaigns, possible draft policy language, and additional site-level practice—to return for future debate.
