Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Homelessness Shelter Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Strafford County updates state grant paperwork and debates long‑term shelter options

2377920 · February 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County staff said an updated certificate of authority and insurance were submitted to secure $100,000 per year in state funds for the county cold‑weather shelter; commissioners discussed capacity, staffing, and potential permanent sites amid concerns about mental‑health resources and service costs.

County staff told Strafford County commissioners Feb. 14 they have prepared a reimbursement request and need an updated certificate of authority and certificate of insurance to draw down a state grant for the county's cold‑weather shelter.

The county reported it will receive $100,000 per year for the shelter, with the current contract covering two consecutive fiscal cycles (July 1–June 30). Staff said the county has received $50,000 from Dover and has invoiced Rochester for an additional $50,000; the state money will be drawn down through the county. The presenter said most shelter guests—"99% of them are from Strafford County, at least they claim they are"—lack identification and that many are experiencing mental‑health issues.

Meeting participants discussed operational strain on police and emergency medical services in Somersworth and other communities that host the shelter. Commissioners and staff said the shelter has had no children and that the operation is designed to provide life‑saving shelter during extreme weather and to refer guests to existing services such as CAP (Community Action Program) and SOS. The county emphasized the shelter is not intended as a rehabilitation program.

Participants raised long‑term questions about where a permanent shelter should be located and how to fund it. Potential permanent sites discussed included an assisted‑living facility that was listed for sale and other private properties; one participant estimated that facility's assessed value at roughly $1.8 million to $2.2 million and suggested an annual tax bill in the range of $22,000–$35,000 depending on rates. Commissioners discussed payment‑in‑lieu‑of‑taxes arrangements and formulas to share operating costs among cities and towns. Several members said no single community wants a permanent facility in their backyard.

Speakers pointed to broader service gaps: a lack of state psychiatric beds and qualified staff, court rulings requiring timely hearings for involuntary commitments, and the county jail serving as a de facto mental‑health holding location. The meeting referenced cases brought by NAMI that led to hearings for hospitalized individuals waiting for state beds, and a separate case by a hospital association related to compensation for hospital care while patients waited for placement.

Staff said the state grant likely uses ARPA funds and that the contract was signed before a December deadline to allow spending into the 2024–25 and 2025–26 fiscal years. County staff said they will finalize the updated certificate and insurance so the reimbursement request can proceed.