Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee backs SCR 102 to request after‑action review of Idaho’s COVID response; $10,000 estimated cost

2377848 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House State Affairs Committee voted to send SCR 102 to the House floor with a "do pass" recommendation after Senator Foreman presented the concurrent resolution requesting a legislative council committee to conduct an after‑action review of Idaho’s COVID‑19 response.

The House State Affairs Committee voted to send SCR 102 to the floor with a "do pass" recommendation after Senator Foreman told members the resolution requests that the Legislative Council appoint a committee to investigate Idaho state government's response to the COVID‑19 pandemic.

Senator Foreman said the resolution seeks an "after action" review to compile the fragmented public record into a single report that could guide future preparedness. "It simply represents a request for useful information to be employed if we must respond to a similar future scribe," he said, adding the resolution "does not seek to point fingers or impart blame."

Committee members debated scope and objectivity. Representative Dygert questioned whether consensus was achievable; Foreman said a careful, academic approach could produce useful findings. Representative Barbieri asked why a committee would add to an already public record; Foreman replied that public records exist but are piecemeal and that "the average constituent isn't gonna put in the time or effort" to assemble them.

Representative Keeley proposed a substitute motion to send SCR 102 to general orders, arguing the resolution lacked explicit scientific and public‑health expertise; the substitute failed. Several committee members discussed whether the interim committee would have subpoena power and whether the $10,000 estimate would be sufficient; Foreman said the $10,000 figure came from consultation with counsel and assumed an in‑house review without outside experts. Representative Scott moved to send the concurrent resolution to the floor with a due‑pass recommendation.

The committee approved the motion by voice vote; the chair recorded Representative Achilles and Representative Kasner as voting no on the record. The chair then adjourned the committee.