Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electronic Notifications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee introduces electronic‑notification draft with delayed onboarding for local governments
Summary
RS 32,235 would let state agencies and, later, local governments use online publication with a brief printed notice linking to the full text; the committee introduced the RS and sponsors clarified the printed notice remains permissive, not mandatory.
Get email alerts on the Electronic Notifications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Jeff Aylers, R‑District 21 of Meridian, presented RS 32,235 to the House State Affairs Committee as a revision to previous electronic‑notification proposals. "We've heard concerns of committee members and have made some adjustments," Aylers said. He described two principal changes: a delayed onboarding schedule for nonstate entities and a temporary allowance for abbreviated newspaper notices that include a link to the full notice on an official website.
The nut graf: Under the draft, 2025 would be used to build the electronic notification system; state agencies would be allowed to use it beginning in 2026 so the state can pilot and address bugs. Local governments and other required publishers would not be required to onboard until 2027, and in the interim may publish an abbreviated printed notice that links to the full notice on the county or government website.
Aylers said the abbreviated notice would be printed in a newspaper but could be shorter than the full text so long as it provides the link to the full notice on an official site. When asked for clarification whether the short printed notice is mandatory, Aylers confirmed that the statute as drafted leaves the printed notice as permissive: "Yes, that is correct. The abbreviated notice will still be printed in a newspaper," and later the sponsor clarified the bill leaves the option as a "may."
A motion to introduce RS 32,235 was made and the committee approved the motion by voice vote; no opposing votes were recorded on the record. The sponsor asked the committee to print the RS for a later hearing where more detailed discussion and possible amendments can occur.
The draft includes schedule language and transitional provisions; the committee did not vote on a hearing date during this session.
