Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials Bluebonnet topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Angelo ISD tables decision on Texas 'Bluebonnet' reading curriculum after hours of public comment
Summary
The San Angelo ISD Board postponed a vote on instructional materials tied to House Bill 1605 — including the Texas Bluebonnet Learning suite — after parents, teachers and community members raised concerns about religious content, scripted lessons and transparency. The board set a follow-up vote for a March 10 pre-agenda workshop.
The San Angelo Independent School District Board of Trustees on Feb. 24 tabled a decision on instructional materials created under House Bill 1605, including the Texas Bluebonnet Learning reading program, and moved the matter to a March 10 pre-agenda workshop for further consideration.
The board’s action followed more than an hour of public comment from parents, teachers and community members who expressed objections to the Bluebonnet readers and concerns about House Bill 1605’s new review process and entitlements. The board’s postponement came after administrators described the state’s Instructional Materials Review and Approval (IMRA) process, the role of the State Board of Education and the Texas Education Agency, and possible state entitlements tied to adopting a State Board–approved resource.
Why it matters: House Bill 1605 changed how the state approves and funds instructional materials. District officials told trustees that adopting a State Board–approved program could generate roughly $1.0 million in an annual entitlement for SAISD and an additional approximately $237,000 tied to state-developed open educational resources (about $1.2 million total). Bluebonnet Learning is the program on the state list that would also qualify the district to receive a per-student printing reimbursement; district staff said that combined state entitlements and print reimbursements could affect the district budget and implementation planning.
Parents and teachers urged the board to delay. Karen Best, identified in public comment as a parent, read passages from a Bluebonnet reader and said the materials “are not education” and called some of the content “crap.” Shanna Payne, a 19‑year SAISD teacher, said she had used a version of the curriculum and criticized its pacing, the volume of worksheets and its scripted lessons, saying the format reduced teacher discretion and limited time for individualized reading instruction. Other speakers — including Ginger Moore, a San Angelo resident with a master’s in early childhood, and Alexandra Luning, a parent — said the materials included religious content they thought belonged in private or religious education, not public schools.
District staff described the legal and administrative constraints. "The TEKS are the actual curriculum," Doctor Gomez said when explaining that alignment to Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills is a statutory requirement and that the State Board of Education (SBOE) and the Texas Education Agency (TEA) have distinct roles in approval and assessment. Staff also explained the new parental-portal requirement established by the bill and the difference between skill components (phonics) and the broader knowledge/reader components in an instructional program.
Board discussion focused on process, teacher support and local control. Trustees asked whether teachers would be forced to read scripted lessons verbatim, how pacing would be enforced, and what parental opt-outs would look like in practice. Board members emphasized teacher professional learning communities and campus-level supports as ways to preserve teacher craft while ensuring standards alignment. Several trustees said they wanted the full board present for any final vote and more time to review materials.
Action taken: The board moved to table the item to the March 10 finance/pre-agenda meeting (5:45 p.m.). The motion passed by voice vote (6–0). The board president, Taylor Kingman, announced the date and time for the follow-up meeting.
Next steps and context: District staff said they will use the interval before March 10 to answer remaining questions, refine cost estimates for printing and implementation, and prepare materials for the parental portal required under the new state process. Administrators noted that the district’s current elementary materials (national versions of Amplify for reading and Eureka/Carnegie for math) were provided to districts during the COVID emergency response and that Bluebonnet Learning is the Texas-specific evolution intended to align explicitly with Texas standards under HB 1605.
Public comment also included requests for more transparent access to complete curricula prior to a vote and appeals for the board to allow more time for teachers and families to review the materials districtwide.
