Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Survey topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
TASB employee-opinion survey shows mixed results; district and board debate release and next steps
Summary
A TASB-administered employee-opinion survey covering Judson ISD produced a 48–49% participation rate; results showed strengths in coworker relationships and child nutrition but declines in several categories. The district and board discussed confidentiality, whether to release the full report publicly, and next steps for action planning.
Judson ISD contracted TASB HR Services for an employee-opinion survey covering working conditions, relationships with supervisors, leadership perceptions, and other workplace factors. Jennifer Barton, senior HR consultant with TASB, presented a high-level overview of methodology and results: 1,751 employees responded (about 48–49% of the district’s roughly 3,629 employees), and the survey captured responses by job type, time of service and work location.
TASB identified strengths — high marks for respectful treatment, meaningful work and positive coworker relationships — and areas for attention, including perceptions of recognition from principals and directors and satisfaction with resources for teachers of special populations. Compensation responses were mixed: respondents judged benefits staff positively and indicated compensation was increasingly competitive with surrounding districts, but fewer than half said pay was “fair for the work.” Child Nutrition showed improvements across multiple measures.
The presentation prompted an extended discussion among trustees and cabinet members about timing, response rates and what to publish. TASB and district staff said the full, item‑level report and any verbatim comments were provided to the superintendent for internal planning; TASB said detailed comments are not shared publicly because they could be used to identify individual employees. The board discussed whether to publish the full report; administrators said they would provide a forward‑facing summary on the website and proposed internal action items. Trustees emphasized the need for a clear, measurable action plan tied to the survey findings and to present subsequent steps to staff.
Board and staff agreed to use survey findings to guide tactical actions (recognition, supervisor feedback, and professional development) and to provide scorecard‑aligned monitoring on selected items; staff said they will return with priorities and proposed actions. Several trustees urged prompt outreach to employees and follow-up surveys once changes are implemented.
