Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Creek Bank Stabilization topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee defeats $24,882 design request for Austin Creek bank stabilization; asks for more study and orders temporary safety measures
Summary
The Finance Committee declined to fund $24,882 for design and permitting of the Austin Creek bank stabilization project, citing large anticipated construction costs and limited near‑term funding; staff will implement temporary safety measures at the site.
The Finance Committee declined to approve a $24,882 capital request to fund design and permitting for Austin Creek bank stabilization after members raised concerns about overall project cost and long‑term funding.
The request specifically asked for design and permitting work by Chinook Engineering (the proposal included $18,000 for Chinook, about $3,000 in county permitting fees and a 10% contingency in the package). Michael Bennett, who toured the site with golf course staff, described a short section of creek bank between Austin Creek and the community garden where erosion has reduced the distance from garden fence to creek to roughly 8–10 feet and where a collapsed tree has fallen into the stream.
“What I saw when I went out there … the bank is undermined. I wouldn't even want to get up near the edge of it,” Bennett said. He and staff recommended immediate safety precautions such as placing logs or boulders to stop golf carts from cutting across the eroded area; staff said logs or boulders would be placed in the next few days and signs would be posted.
Several committee members questioned whether spending roughly $25,000 on a full design and permitting package made sense given committee members’ guidance that actual stabilization could require much larger sums — committee discussion cited rough construction estimates ranging from $150,000 to $250,000 or possibly more for full bank stabilization (examples mentioned included driven piles, bulkheads or riprap). Committee members expressed concern about spending for study if capital funds to implement a recommended solution would not be available.
After discussion, the committee moved the design/permitting motion and then voted to defeat it; members agreed to bring the issue to the board with a recommendation to seek additional information and alternatives (such as lower‑cost mitigation, targeted stabilization alternatives, grant opportunities, or a limited engineering consultation rather than full permitting). Committee members also said staff should explore grant possibilities; staff noted most grant cycles are 18 months to two years out and are often matching awards.
What happens next
- The motion to allocate $24,882 for Austin Creek bank repair design and permitting failed; the committee will report the discussion and its reasons to the SVCA board. - Staff will install temporary logs/boulders and signage at the site to block golf‑cart access and reduce immediate safety risk. - Committee members asked staff to seek lower‑cost options, short assessments or consultations and to investigate potential grant funding, then return with clearer alternatives.
Why it matters
The eroding bank is adjacent to a community garden and near recreational paths; erosion poses a safety risk and could threaten amenities if not addressed. Committee members were unanimous that the safety risk warranted immediate, low‑cost temporary mitigation, but they declined to authorize the full design/permitting package without additional study and assurance of implementation funding.
Provenance
Discussion and the failed motion are recorded in the transcript during the Lower Austin Creek Bank Stabilization agenda item (beginning ~2195s; motion read ~3604s; vote and follow‑up discussion ~3644s–3660s).
