Green Bay’s Sustainability Commission voted Feb. 19 to recommend ending the city‑sponsored No Mow May program and instead to promote “healthy lawn and landscaping practices that support pollinator habitats and stormwater management.” The motion passed after an extended discussion of the program’s benefits and administrative costs.

Commission members and staff said No Mow May succeeded at raising awareness about pollinators but imposed costs and operational burdens on city services. Melissa (city staff) said long‑grass complaints “really skyrocket during that month,” adding that crews must check the No Mow May registration map, respond to complaints and replace stolen signs. She said the program has also produced more calls about residents expecting pick‑up of lawn clippings and other unintended burdens on operations staff.

The commission heard arguments on both sides. Vice Chair Ned Neddorf said the program helped start conversations and can be an easy, visible way for residents to participate, but he urged a transition that lets the public still “buy into something” and be proud of their yards. Several commissioners proposed alternatives including: expanding the city’s pollinator corridor map (with a June 2025 target to begin broader promotion), leaning on the city’s Planned Natural Landscapes registration, offering educational resources about horticulturally sound mowing practices, seed packets or small neighborhood plant sales, and a future signage or recognition program for registered planned natural landscapes.

Staff and commissioners discussed operational details for a transition. Melissa said the city has leftover No Mow May signs from past years and did not budget for additional signage in 2025; she advised the commission to coordinate messaging so the city can publish clear information before May. Commissioners asked that some materials be ready by April to help the public understand the change and alternatives available.

Commissioners framed the vote as ending the city’s formal sponsorship and implementation of No Mow May, not as prohibiting residents from following similar practices on their own. Krista Keenan, the commission chair, read a proposed recommendation that summarized the group’s approach and asked for it to be the formal motion. Mark Walter moved the recommendation; Vice Chair Neddorf seconded. When called, the commissioners voted in favor; no opposition was recorded.

The commission directed staff and the Healthy Habitats work group to draft outreach materials and a transition plan, to coordinate with the city website and social media, and to develop options for public recognition (signage or comparable tools) in future years.

The decision will be transmitted to the Common Council as the commission’s recommendation; any formal change to city programs or budgets would be the Council’s responsibility.

Ending No Mow May concluded a months‑long review in which commissioners balanced public interest and visibility against administrative burden and questions about ecological effectiveness. The commission expects follow‑up at or before its March meeting to provide draft outreach language for public release before the May lawn‑care season.