Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Evidence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate concurs to enhance penalties for tampering with physical evidence in homicide cases, 44-6
Summary
House Bill 44, which creates an enhanced penalty when tampering with or fabricating physical evidence in connection with a homicide hinders a coroner or medical examiner's ability to determine cause or manner of death, passed the Senate by a 44-6 vote after debate about appropriate maximum sentences.
Senator Smith carried House Bill 44, which establishes an enhanced penalty for tampering with or fabricating physical evidence when that conduct interferes with the ability of a coroner or medical examiner to determine cause or manner of death in a homicide investigation.
"We already have a tampering with evidence bill. The maximum penalty is 10 years. In this bill, we're talking about an enhanced penalty in connection with a homicide ... when doing so affects the ability of a coroner or a medical examiner to determine either a cause of death, manner of death, or both," Smith said, recounting a homicide investigation in which evidence-handling mattered to prosecution and victims' families.
Senator Trevis asked whether opponents had appeared in committee; the sponsor said there were none. Several senators expressed concern about the proposed 40-year maximum that the bill makes available for particularly severe tampering. Senator Trevis said, "40 years kinda seems excessive if you haven't necessarily been convicted" of homicide and urged consideration of a lower maximum.
The sponsor and proponents emphasized that the bill sets a maximum and that sentencing would remain individualized. "It's up to a judge," Smith said in response, noting sentencing depends on prior record and case circumstances and that the statute provides a maximum rather than an automatic sentence.
The Senate recorded 44 votes in favor and six opposed on second-reading concurrence. Supporters said the enhanced maximum addresses cases where tampering materially undermines homicide prosecutions and victim-family closure; opponents warned about disproportionality in certain scenarios.
The carrier emphasized judges retain discretion and that the penalty is intended for cases where evidence destruction materially impedes establishing cause or manner of death.
