Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ctc Workplan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

California commission outlines work plan and staff deliverables for road-charge pilot design

2373996 · February 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The California Transportation Commission’s Road Charge Technical Advisory Committee heard Washington and Oregon briefings and agreed staff will draft a work plan, circulate a meeting schedule and post minutes. The committee will deliberate policy choices and receive technical follow-ups to shape a California demonstration design.

Members of California’s Road Charge Technical Advisory Committee convened for a multi-agency briefing that included presentations from Washington and Oregon. The committee chair and staff summarized near-term logistics and asked staff to prepare written materials so members can review and iterate on policy decisions in future meetings.

Staff said they will circulate the calendar and meeting locations for the committee’s next sessions, post minutes and maintain a common set of briefing and communication materials. Committee staff described a meeting-by-meeting approach: committee members will consider discrete policy questions (privacy, enforcement, reporting options, participant recruitment and cost modeling) and staff will draft language capturing the committee’s decisions for subsequent review.

Committee members raised schedule and production-process questions. Staff responded that policy-level decisions would be recorded and that Caltrans and commission staff will produce the more detailed concept-of-operations and demonstration design elements once high‑level policy direction is settled. Staff also said they plan to develop outreach materials and briefings for the governor’s office, legislators and stakeholder groups and to coordinate with Washington and Oregon on lessons learned.

Ending: Staff committed to circulate meeting dates and locations and to post minutes and meeting materials; committee members asked staff to maintain clear timelines and to ensure technical follow-up on cost, privacy and enforcement questions before the next session.