Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health System topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Needham staff outline statewide ‘Foundational Public Health Services’ assessment, timeline and tools
Summary
Public-health staff briefed the board on the statewide Foundational Public Health Services assessment process, which will use cost and service-delivery tools to map local capacity and identify gaps across shared-service collaboratives.
Needham public-health staff walked the Board of Health through the state’s adoption and local assessment process for the Foundational Public Health Services (FPHS) framework.
Why it matters: Massachusetts is adopting FPHS—standards that define minimum public-health services and headline responsibilities—and 51 shared-services organizations are completing assessments to document current capacity, gaps and costs. The work is intended to produce quantifiable data to support program planning, capacity building and funding requests.
Staff described two primary tools in the assessment: a cost tool that asks for line-item salary, benefit and operating inputs (wages, benefits, full-time equivalents, contracted services) and a service-delivery tool that scores each foundational area and capability on a four-point scale (absent, limited, moderate, comprehensive) for both expertise and capacity. An inspectional-services (ISD) add-on exists for collaboratives where inspection sits in a separate division; it does not apply to Needham’s four-community shared-services group.
The assessment will also allocate staff time across foundational areas and capabilities to produce a composite view of where resources are spent. A state-contracted consultant (BME Strategies) will support shared-services groups; Needham staff also named an assigned state consultant and said shared-services staff (including Amy McInerney and others) will assist local communities. Cost-tool work is already underway; staff said Jen Casey is taking a first pass for Needham and its collaborative.
Timeline and use: data collection is under way; staff expect compiled results to the state and shared-services leads by May. The statewide rollup will guide shared-services work plans for the next fiscal year and inform conversations about gaps and potential funding needs (the presentation included Wisconsin’s example gap analysis). Implementation planning is targeted to begin in the following fiscal year.
Ending: staff said the process will be iterative and is intended as a recurring assessment to track changes over time; they will return with Needham’s collaborative results and recommended priorities once the assessment is complete.
