Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Update topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears legislative update; officials flag potential $6.5 million funding impact and open‑enrollment bills
Summary
District officials briefed the board on pending state legislation, including two open‑enrollment proposals and budget items that could withhold state funding; trustees were urged to monitor bills that could affect transportation, attendance rules and state funding formula adjustments.
District administrators briefed the Lee's Summit R‑VII board on a set of pending Missouri education bills and budget items that could materially affect the district’s funding and operations, including a proposed withholding in the governor’s budget and competing open‑enrollment bills in the House and Senate.
The presenter said the governor’s budget proposal contains a $300 million withholding to the state funding formula; "So for us, that's 6 and a half million dollars," the presenter said, explaining that if the statewide withholding is enacted the district could see an approximately $6.5 million reduction in state aid next year.
Trustees were shown two competing open‑enrollment proposals. Senate Bill 215 would expand transfer rules currently limited to unaccredited districts to all districts, the presenter said, allowing moves without district consent and creating open transfers that could be unlimited. The presenter warned that SB 215 would not allow districts to choose whether to participate. By contrast, House Bill 711 (sponsored by Rep. Brad Pollitt) would let districts opt into accepting transfer students and imposes a 3% annual cap on students a district can lose; HB 711 also includes attendance‑based provisions that could require returning a student who does not meet attendance thresholds.
Officials said concerns about open enrollment include transportation costs and local tax dilution. The presenter described how transportation could create additional expense if students travel long distances to other districts, and that state aid follows students while local property tax dollars do not.
School‑day and calendar items were also discussed. The presenter said there are bills (House Bill 607 and House Bill 712) that would permit districts to recover certain funding when a calendar is reduced for weather and would extend a "work after retirement" policy used to fill hard‑to‑staff positions. Senate Bill 727 was mentioned as not including a related technical fix, prompting the proposed bills.
The presenter also reviewed longer‑term revenue risks: lawmakers have proposed reductions in income tax rates and other property‑tax measures that could lower state revenue. "If they lower that, without other revenue, that would be concerning because can they afford public education and other things they do," the presenter said, noting that Missouri ranks low in state funding per pupil and the district relies heavily on local funding.
Trustees asked procedural questions about how to respond. Board Member Miller asked how concerned trustees should be about open enrollment; the presenter said Senate support for open enrollment has changed with turnover and that this year appears more uncertain than in past sessions.
Administrators encouraged board participation in upcoming advocacy events, including an MSBA day and a legislative breakfast scheduled for March 21 during public school week, and recommended contacting legislators about district priorities.
The board took no formal action on the legislative items during the work session.
