Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics And Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission requests written county-attorney opinion on potential conflicts where commissioners' spouses serve on school board
Summary
Amid repeated complaints about the appearance of impropriety when commissioners' spouses sit on the school board, the commission voted to ask the county attorney for a written opinion regarding potential ethical conflicts and voting patterns; motion passed after extended debate.
After an extended and sometimes contentious discussion about perceived conflicts of interest and voting patterns involving commissioners and spouses who sit on the school board, Beaufort County commissioners voted to request a written opinion from the county attorney on whether the recent behavior of board members raises ethical violations.
One commissioner said the practice of husband-and-wife pairs voting in lockstep on related matters creates an appearance of impropriety and suggested abstention by one member of each pair when school matters come before the commissioners. Other commissioners cited legal guidance received historically that spouses on separate elected bodies do not automatically create a disqualifying conflict and said they would not recuse themselves from votes.
The county attorney agreed to prepare a written opinion assessing whether a conflict of interest or other ethics rule applies to the described voting patterns and to return the opinion in writing. The board then voted on the motion; transcript indicates the vote passed (roll-call not recorded verbatim in the text provided). Several commissioners asked for the opinion to be explicit and in writing so that consistent practice can be applied moving forward.
