Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Cargo Containers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission forwards relaxed cargo‑container rules with edits; staff will clean grammar before Council
Summary
After multiple meetings and line‑by‑line review, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended changes to PCMC 15.65 (cargo storage containers), clarifying rear‑yard allowances, side‑yard discretion, and procedural language; staff will prepare a clean, grammar‑checked draft before Council.
Parowan commissioners on Feb. 19 voted to recommend amendments to Parowan City Municipal Code 15.65, which governs cargo storage containers, after several prior meetings and a detailed, clause‑by‑clause review.
Staff said the changes are intended to relax certain restrictions while retaining controls that prevent containers from creating obstructions and to preserve neighborhood character. Commissioners asked staff to clarify inconsistent wording about allowed placement (side yard vs. rear yard) and to add a clear cross‑reference that side‑yard placement must be permitted by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Dan (city staff) summarized the edits and explained the rationale: the code will treat containers as accessory buildings subject to accessory building area rules (the 25% rule), allow up to two containers in commercial and highway service zones (with conditional use required for more), require containers to be in side or rear yards subject to setback rules, and prohibit placement that creates an obstruction to adjoining properties.
Commissioner discussion focused on two points: an apparent contradiction between a clause that limited placement to rear yards and another clause that allowed side‑yard placement, and the need for a discretionary review when placement in a side yard could create sight‑line or site‑obstruction issues. Commissioners agreed to insert explicit language near the start of the section stating that side‑yard containers require Planning and Zoning approval; staff said it would produce a clean, grammatically reviewed copy before forwarding to Council.
A motion to recommend the modifications to PCMC 15.65 was moved and seconded and carried by voice vote. Staff cautioned that if the commission makes significant substantive changes to the redline, another public hearing might be required.
If Council adopts the ordinance, the code will explicitly allow rear‑yard containers under accessory‑building area limits, limit commercial zones to two containers without conditional‑use approval, and make side‑yard placement discretionary with commission review to avoid obstruction to neighboring properties.
