Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Boundary Proposals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee hears that three separate boundary proposals met procedural requirements, staff says

2364656 · February 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its fourth meeting, a Bradley County committee was told that the city of Cleveland, the city of Charleston and Bradley County each submitted separate boundary proposals that followed state law; no formal action on the proposals was taken.

At its fourth meeting, a Bradley County committee was told that three separate boundary proposals — from the city of Cleveland, the city of Charleston and Bradley County — have followed procedural steps required by state law, staff member Robert said.

Robert told the committee that the three entities submitted their proposals independently: the city of Cleveland did so in the late summer of 2024, the city of Charleston submitted a resolution about a month ago signed by Mayor Lattimore, and the county finalized its proposal in January. "All 3 entities... have followed procedure according to what state law dictates," Robert said.

The remarks were offered as the committee began new-business discussion about boundaries; no vote on any map, ordinance or resolution related to the proposals was recorded in the transcript. Robert said members were likely familiar with the boundaries and noted there is another map available; Cindy Slater was identified as having copies to distribute. The meeting record shows the group approved its minutes earlier in the session by voice vote, but the transcript does not record a roll-call tally on that item.

Committee members who were listed on the meeting roll call include Adam Lewis, Linda Cash, David Lettimore, Ken Webb, Craig Mullenax, Tom Cry, Jonathan Job, Kevin Brooks, Cindy Slater, Tim Lawson, Brian Workman and David Rollins. Aside from the procedural approval of minutes, the transcript contains no formal motions or votes on the boundary proposals themselves.

The committee did not specify next steps, a schedule for formal consideration, or any requirements for further public hearings during the recorded portion of the meeting. Copies of the alternate map are available from Cindy Slater, according to Robert's remarks. The committee proceeded to other agenda items after the exchange.