Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Knollwood 3300 Knollwood topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission approves Knollwood rezoning with recorded limits after neighborhood opposition
Summary
The Mobile City Planning Commission approved a rezoning and subdivision for 3300 Knollwood Drive to allow clustered multifamily development, subject to recorded voluntary use restrictions capping density, a 100-foot buffer, and a traffic-impact study after neighbors raised concerns about runoff, traffic and oversupply of senior units.
Mobile City Planning Commission approved on Feb. 20 a rezoning and subdivision for 3300 Knollwood Drive, known as Knollwood Place First Edition, changing the site from R-1 (single-family suburban) and B-1 (buffer) to R-3 (multifamily suburban) and accepting a subdivision of the 17.16-acre parcel.
The commission approved the rezoning and the subdivision with conditions that include a traffic-impact study, engineering compliance, and recorded voluntary use restrictions that the applicant agreed would limit residential density to no more than 3.5 dwelling units per acre (about 60 units for the site) and create a minimum 100-foot landscaped setback from the adjacent residential lots to the west.
The limits were presented to the commission by the applicant’s representative, Casey Pipes of Helmsing, Leach, et al., who told the commission that staff had reported an incorrect future-land-use designation and that a voluntary use restriction had been prepared so the project would not exceed the stated density. "We put a voluntary use condition filed in, no more than 3 and a half dwelling units per acre. That would cap the number of units, for this site at 60," Pipes said.
Neighbors and nearby property owners urged the commission to reject or delay the request. Jason Salzberg, representing Norwood/Gordon Oaks senior-care properties near the site, said adding another large senior complex risked "oversaturation," noting his facilities were operating well below capacity. Other residents questioned whether proposed stormwater controls would prevent runoff onto existing yards and said added traffic would strain narrow local streets.
Applicant materials and the voluntary use restrictions indicate the developer intends clustered townhouse-style units with garages and that the site will be pushed away from the neighboring single-family subdivision, with the 100-foot buffer noted in site materials. Casey Pipes said the proposed layout was intended to leave the steeper, vegetated area near the western property line largely undisturbed and routed stormwater into a detention pond designed so that post-development discharge would match existing runoff rates.
Commissioners required a traffic-impact study as a condition of approval and included standard engineering, urban forestry and fire-department compliance. The voluntary use restriction will be recorded in the probate office and remain tied to the property unless changed by a future official action.
What happens next: the developer must submit a traffic-impact study and fully engineered site plans that comply with the conditions before building permits or other approvals for development. The recorded voluntary use restriction and the 100-foot setback apply to future owners unless they return to the commission and city council and obtain new approvals.
The commission’s votes were taken by voice; specific roll-call tallies were not recorded in the public transcript.
