Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Comptroller letter prompts commission bid for line‑item budget and improved annual reporting

2364527 · February 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee 13 discussed a Tennessee Comptroller letter that requires more complete line‑item budget schedules and warned that future budgets missing minimum materials will not be approved; commissioners asked staff to deliver line‑item schedules and historical unspent fund trends.

During Committee 13 (Audit) commissioners reviewed the county’s second quarter financial report and discussed a September 25, 2024 letter from the Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury that instructs local governments to submit detailed, line‑item budget schedules with every annual budget submission.

The comptroller’s letter states that future submissions not meeting the budget manual’s minimum requirements — including department‑level, line‑item detail across all funds and beginning cash balances — will not be approved. Committee members emphasized that Shelby County previously complied with detailed line‑item budgeting (the last full line‑item submission the committee referenced was February 2021) and asked administration and budget staff to restore that practice going forward.

Commissioner Ford and others said line‑item budgets improve transparency and help flag issues such as salary restrictions and fund‑balance trends. Committee members requested: (a) line‑item budget schedules for the upcoming FY2026 submission; (b) recent trends in unspent funds by department for the past three to five fiscal years; and (c) a timetable for delivery of the countywide compensation study (staff said the compensation vendor expects first deliverables in March/April). Finance staff agreed to provide the requested detailed schedules and historical data and noted that timing constraints and the property‑tax revenue calendar require careful coordination.

The discussion concluded with committee direction to have staff return with the line‑item schedules and supporting documentation for the full commission’s review before the next budget cycle.