Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy Package topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances $200 million tax-relief package; lawmakers disagree on timing and budget impact
Summary
The Arizona House Ways and Means Committee returned House Bill 2918 with a due-pass-as-amended recommendation after debating a sponsor-backed plan to deliver about $200 million in ongoing tax relief by trimming rates across income, sales and qualifying property-tax calculations.
The House Ways and Means Committee returned House Bill 2918, as amended, with a due-pass recommendation after a lengthy debate over budget implications and tax policy.
Ways and Means analyst Vince Perez told the committee the sponsor’s intent was to reduce the state’s three major revenue sources — the property-tax qualifying tax rate (QTR), certain TPT classifications and the individual income tax — by equal-percentage reductions that, combined, would total roughly $200 million in ongoing tax relief. The bill as amended sets a 4.93% rate for certain school-qualifying-rate calculations and lowers the individual income-tax rate to 2.47% for individuals, estates, trusts and small businesses; the sponsor said the $200 million estimate is ongoing.
Committee debate reflected familiar trade-offs between tax relief and budget stability. The Arizona Center for Economic Progress testified in respectful opposition, saying the state could face future budget stress and calling attention to last year’s budget deficit tied in part to prior tax reductions. The center’s witness estimated a comparable $200 million ongoing revenue reduction and warned the state’s multiyear budget could be at risk.
Supporters said passing incremental, broad-based tax relief is a policy priority and argued the reductions could be absorbed without immediate cuts. Representative Livingston and others said they were willing to advance the bill to let floor and budget negotiations determine final trade-offs. Representative Plattman and others said they opposed taking $200 million without a clear offset or plan to restore the revenue in a future deficit scenario.
The committee approved the chair’s technical amendment (setting precise QTR rates for certain school districts) and then moved the bill as amended. On the roll call, the committee returned HB2918 as amended with a due-pass recommendation (recorded as 5 ayes, 4 nays). Several members explained their floor votes, noting fiscal concerns and deference to further budget negotiations.
