Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Taxation Sales Exemptions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs sales-tax exemption for new adaptive driving equipment
Summary
The Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee unanimously recommended first substitute House Bill 79, which exempts sales tax on newly purchased adaptive driving equipment installed in vehicles or sold through dealerships; fiscal details were not specified.
The Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee voted to give a favorable recommendation to first substitute House Bill 79, which would exempt sales tax on certain adaptive driving equipment when purchased new or sold through dealerships.
Representative Watkins, the bill sponsor, told the committee the measure grew out of a constituent request about a vehicle fitted with adaptive driving equipment worth an additional $5,000–$6,000. Representative Jenkins said, “It started out with a constituent calling about, buying a vehicle with, adaptive equipment in it,” and said the proposal would exempt sales tax on the adaptive equipment if it is purchased new or installed by a dealership.
The bill enumerates adaptive modifications such as wheelchair and scooter lifts, wheelchair securing equipment, swivel seats, hand and foot controls, and steering aids. Representative Watkins said dealerships that specialize in installing such equipment make the exemption administrable when the equipment is supplied and installed by those dealers.
Committee members questioned fiscal impacts and administration. Senator Harper asked whether the bill had a fiscal note; Representative Watkins replied “Yes,” and later said she did not know if the exemption was funded. Chairman Dan McKay and Representative Watkins discussed enforcing claims via existing vehicle identification number (VIN) inspections at registration. McKay said it “feels like we should be able to accomplish that” with VIN or post‑sale inspections; Representative Watkins said the tax commission had raised concerns earlier about fraud and administrative burden, which drove the bill’s narrower approach.
There was no public comment. Senator Harper moved to pass the first substitute of House Bill 79 with a favorable recommendation; the motion passed unanimously 3–0.
The committee record shows the bill narrows an earlier, broader exemption proposal after the Utah State Tax Commission signaled enforcement and fraud‑prevention concerns. The bill’s text sets the exemption on newly purchased adaptive equipment or equipment installed and sold by dealerships; who pays the sales tax on the underlying vehicle and how costs for administration will be covered were described as not specified in committee discussion.
Action on the measure now moves to the full Senate calendar.
