Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Nibin Sb246 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears ATF testimony on NIBIN while debating violent-crime bill; Senate Bill 246 moved to subcommittee
Summary
The committee heard ATF testimony on the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network as members discussed Senate Bill 246, a proposed "Violent Crime Prevention Act" requiring law enforcement to submit ballistics data for certain violent offenses; the bill was moved to subcommittee.
Get email alerts on the Nibin Sb246 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The committee heard a detailed briefing from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives on the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network (NIBIN) as it considered a committee substitute for Senate Bill 246, a proposed "Violent Crime Prevention Act" that would require West Virginia law enforcement agencies to submit ballistics data for firearms alleged to have been used in specified violent crimes.
Acting Special Agent Albert J. "AJ" Gibbs of the ATF described NIBIN as a national system that links ballistic evidence — primarily expended cartridge cases — so investigators can determine whether casings and firearms recovered at separate scenes were fired from the same weapon. "It's the National Integrated Ballistics Information Network," Gibbs said. "This is a program that's been established since 1997 that essentially links ballistic evidence that are recovered at crime scenes...and be able to determine if they were in fact fired by the same firearm." He told senators that images of casings are run against a national catalog and that firearm examiners review matches to confirm comparisons.
Gibbs said West Virginia currently has several NIBIN sites: two in Charleston (Charleston Police Department and the West Virginia State Police Scribe Laboratory), one in Huntington and a fourth machine recently arrived for Wheeling that officials expected to be operational within about 90 days. He gave examples of cases where NIBIN matches helped investigators: a recent Braxton County drive-by shooting where casings matched a firearm recovered from a suspect, and a Fayette County case where a firearm test fire matched an earlier shooting leading to convictions.
Senators questioned the ATF witness on privacy, procedural safeguards and the scope of the bill. Senator Tarr asked whether images and records entered into NIBIN can be expunged if a suspect is not convicted; Gibbs answered, "there's no, system for those to be expunged or deleted if someone is not convicted," and said agencies retain images because they can link to prior or future crimes. Senator Tarr and others asked whether routine, lawful gun owners could have firearms placed into the system absent probable cause; Gibbs said he had not seen the specific bill text and emphasized that lawful seizure requires probable cause or a warrant.
After hearing testimony and questions, the committee considered a motion from the vice chair to move the committee substitute for Senate Bill 246 to subcommittee for further consideration. The motion carried by voice vote. The chair appointed a subcommittee composed of the senior senator from the fourth, the junior senator from the fifth, the senator from Marion and the senator from Taylor, and later added Senator Fermenga to ensure an odd-numbered panel; the junior senator from the fifth was named chair of that subcommittee.
Committee members also sought clarifications: Gibbs described standard practices as encouraging timely submission of evidence and test-firing lawfully seized firearms to match to shooting incidents; he said the program is used routinely by multiple West Virginia agencies and that the bill as introduced is narrower than some jurisdictions’ practices because the proposed requirement focuses on certain violent offenses. He also confirmed a private contractor supplies the NIBIN equipment and supports its software.
The committee did not vote on the merits of the bill; it instead moved the bill to subcommittee for further study and potential amendment.
