Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council continues public hearing on 833 N. Brand development after months of neighborhood protest
Summary
The council continued an appeal of the Planning and Preservation Commission denial of a 10-unit, three‑story townhouse project at 833 N. Brand Boulevard to March 17 after residents raised concerns about density, parking, traffic and sewer impacts.
The City Council on Tuesday continued a public hearing on an appeal from Midland Contractors Inc. seeking approval to replace a single‑family house with a three‑story, 10‑unit townhouse development and two detached accessory dwelling units at 833 North Brand Boulevard.
The Planning and Preservation Commission denied the project in October 2024 after public testimony and a staff presentation; the developer appealed that denial. The project site sits in a multiple‑family precise development overlay (R2 PD) but several neighbors testified they expected a lower‑density outcome and warned the proposed building — which spans much of the lot and places several units in close proximity to surrounding single‑family homes — would intensify parking and traffic and might strain local sewer and water infrastructure.
During the hearing developers and staff described changes made since the commission meeting: the long three‑story structure was re‑oriented on the lot, landscaping and front‑elevation design were revised, and two deed‑restricted affordable units were included. Staff’s environmental consultant provided a notice of categorical exemption under CEQA (Class 32 infill exemption), stating the project did not meet thresholds requiring more detailed environmental review; neighbors pressed for additional studies and argued the exemption did not address localized impacts they said were evident at the site.
More than two dozen members of the public spoke against the project, citing on‑street parking shortages, loss of neighborhood character, and concerns about construction impacts and school safety. Several speakers provided petitions and written comments; staff confirmed written opposition was provided and will be part of the record.
After public testimony the council voted to continue the hearing to March 17 so staff can provide additional detail requested by council and so the council can study the environmental materials and other follow‑up information. The council asked staff to prepare materials on infrastructure capacity (water/sewer), parking/traffic analysis and to summarize the CEQA exemption rationale for the council and the public prior to the continued hearing.
Ending: The hearing will reconvene on March 17; in the interim the applicant may submit revisions and staff will produce a written response to the issues raised by residents.
