Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council tables PG&E storage/landing‑zone agreement after questions on gates, flight plan and notice language
Summary
Councilors asked PG&E for more details — including a helicopter flight plan, expected flight frequency, gate closure responsibilities, restoration and notice language — and tabled the proposed three‑year lease of city property for staging and helicopter landings until the next meeting.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Contracts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The council reviewed a proposed agreement between the City of Angels and Pacific Gas & Electric that would allow PG&E to use a fenced portion of city property (about two hundred+ acres) at 2600 Highway 49 as a staging area for an anticipated multiyear transmission upgrade project.
PG&E representatives described the site and proposed rental rate of $1,750 per month for three years (total $63,000). Council members and residents raised concerns about access and safety: which gate(s) PG&E would use, the possibility of cows entering the highway if gates were left open, who would be responsible for closing gates, the frequency and flight paths of helicopter operations, road restoration for gravel access roads, and whether the northern access to Highway 49 should be used instead of Little Road because of school traffic and pedestrian safety.
PG&E staff (policy/project team and local government affairs representative Eric Alvarez) said they could fence the access road so the landing zone and staging area would be fenced and gated; Eric Alvarez and Trevor (PG&E project staff) said they would provide more detail about flight plans and anticipated frequency and had experience with similar arrangements on grazing land. Staff also confirmed a restoration clause would be included for access roads.
Council directed staff to return the item at the next meeting with clarified contract language (notice and contact clauses to list the City Administrator, gate/closure responsibility language, and a proposed flight plan and frequency estimate). The item was tabled to the next council meeting so new council members and the incoming city administrator can review remaining questions.

