Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stormwater Master Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Pasco commissioners press for stormwater master plan, cite permitting delays and funding needs after record rains

2359292 · February 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Pasco County public works and partner agencies outlined maintenance, capital projects and a stormwater master plan after an unprecedented 2024 rainfall season; presenters flagged U.S. Army Corps Section 404 permitting delays and discussed HUD and other funding options.

Pasco County public works officials told the Board of County Commissioners on Feb. 18 that a stormwater master plan due in mid‑2025 will rank the county’s most critical projects, estimate costs and propose funding strategies after record rainfall in 2024.

The workshop, led by Jason Mickle, Pasco County public works director, opened with an overview of county maintenance and capital work and a review of the 2024 storm season, which county and district speakers said produced local rain totals far above historical averages. “Our goal is 70% proactive,” Mickle said of operations that TV and clean pipe networks, maintain swales and inspect storm drainage — a county target he contrasted with a regulatory minimum of about 10% annual inspection.

The county emphasized three near‑term strands: routine stormwater maintenance and culvert replacement, an active capital improvement program (including recent and in‑progress projects such as Ironbark, New River and Maggie Valley) and a stormwater master plan the county expects to complete by August 2025. Mickle told the board the master plan will produce a ranked list of roughly 15 priority projects, cost estimates and a recommended financing approach (options include phased funding, borrowing, and pursuing federal or HUD grants).

Why it matters: staff said the 2024 season was extreme — Tampa International Airport recording about 80 inches for the year and individual rain gauges across the county reporting 20–30 inches in October alone — and that many systems exceeded design expectations. David Engel, director of planning and economic development, told commissioners that local regulation of new development is governed by Chapter 900 of the county Land Development Code and that the county distinguishes open basins (managed to a 25‑year storm standard) from closed basins (managed to a 100‑year standard), with three “basins of special concern” already designated in Pasco (East Zephyrhills, Tank Lake and Timber Oaks).

Speakers flagged two constraints that slowed projects after the storms. First, coordination and funding: commissioners asked how the county would pay for the ranked projects; staff said the master plan would include a rate study and look at multi‑year financing. Second, permitting: Mickle and district staff said Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting handled by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers delayed projects that affect wetlands. Mickle said the county is scheduling pre‑application meetings with the Corps and that commissioners and district partners are preparing outreach to federal representatives to request relief or streamlining for specific recovery‑related permitting needs.

Other operational points raised during the workshop included: the county’s culvert replacement program, which county staff credited with reducing historic flooding in multiple neighborhoods; the role of private community infrastructure and the county’s ability to respond only when off‑site or regional impacts are demonstrated; and the need to continue incorporating lessons learned from 2024 into design standards and the master plan. SWFWMD representative Brian Armstrong emphasized regional cooperation and introduced his regulatory and technical staff, who will continue technical support for the county.

Ending: Commissioners and staff asked for follow‑up: a county‑wide inventory of substantially damaged properties, the master plan deliverables and a coordinated letter or advocacy to federal permitting authorities. Staff said they would return with the master plan timeline, cost estimates for the priority list, and next steps for pursuing HUD, HMGP and other funding sources.