Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transfer Of Development Rights topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves condo project using transfer‑of‑development rights on Oakland Park Boulevard amid neighborhood opposition
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Board on Feb. 19 approved a 29‑unit condo at 3000 E. Oakland Park Blvd. that uses the city’s TDR program to add units and height, despite neighborhood opposition centered on traffic and compatibility.
The Fort Lauderdale Planning and Zoning Board on Feb. 19 approved a revised development at 3000 East Oakland Park Boulevard that uses the city’s transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) program to increase allowable units and height for the site.
Applicant Andrew Schein said the project transforms an approved three‑tower, 103‑unit plan into a single 62‑foot tower with 29 condominium units, added retail/restaurant space and 310 parking spaces. The design uses TDRs issued for a historic donor parcel (901 Progreso) that provided certificates for up to 56 units and approximately 93,000 square feet of development rights; Schein said the project purchases a portion of those rights (up to 10 units per acre and 12 feet of height in program rules).
Public comment was extensive and largely opposed. Speakers representing the Coral Ridge Country Club Estates and Coral Ridge Civic Association expressed concerns about traffic congestion on Oakland Park Boulevard and nearby bridges, noted previously approved or proposed projects in the area and requested additional traffic analysis and more outreach. One neighborhood representative said the board was being asked to accept the city’s TDR program outcomes without adequate attention to cumulative traffic impacts.
Board members asked questions about unit mix, trip generation and design tradeoffs. The applicant said the 29‑unit condo plan reduces overall building massing by about 21% compared with the prior approval and that peak‑hour vehicle trips would be fewer than the prior office building on the site (the applicant reported about 33 fewer PM peak trips compared with the former office use, but about a 471‑trip increase in total daily trips). The developer also said the new product is primarily two‑ and three‑bedroom units and would include 13 boat slips (at least two public slips for restaurant use).
After a motion to defer failed, the board approved the site plan (case UDP S24030) on a 4‑3 roll call: yes votes from Patrick McTigue, Steve Gannon, Jay Shechtman and Chair Weymouth; no votes from Sherry McCartney, John Barranco and Vice Chair Brad Cohen. The motion incorporated staff findings and conditions.
The board’s approval allows the project to proceed through the city’s development review and commission call‑up processes; the applicant said it is willing to meet further with neighborhood groups but described cost and design tradeoffs that limit reductions in unit count or height without changing the economics of the proposal.
